I assume there must be a reason why sign language is superior but I genuinely don’t know why.

  • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    American sign language is not a gesture based form of English. It is an entire language in its own right, with its own distinct grammar and vocabulary.

    To someone deaf from birth, sign language is their native language. And it is much more comfortable to quickly read your native language than a second language.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      This raises more questions than it answers, like how do the deaf from birth function in society at all if they struggle with other languages besides sign language. How do they get a job, go to school, learn new skills, read the news, text people? What do they do in their leisure if not watching subtitles movies or reading books? Many non-english speakers end up learning English anyway because of just how pervasive it is.

      • sparr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 months ago

        The same way anyone else for whom English is a second or third language function in society.

        • Gabu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m ESL and use English subtitles when watching a programme in a language I can’t speak…

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You’re on the internet. Most Deaf people these days read English fluently. It’s just that Deaf 70 year olds were often able to get away without becoming actively fluent in English and may not have felt the need to. Closed captions are younger than most people think and they fucking sucked fairly recently. I grew up watching the news with captions and it was distracting if you didn’t need it. Big black boxes with the words said a few seconds ago rapidly appearing on them as they covered stuff. And often captions on prerecorded content wasn’t much better. It was an accessibility feature and treated as such. Technology connections has a great video on closed captions that was almost nostalgic lol.

            Then there’s also the mood. If you grew up with tv that had captions you’re used to it. But before captions we had terps (interpreters). At live events we have them. At a government press release they already needed one because they can’t just show the teleprompter to the Deaf people in the audience. So they just show the terp where we expect to see them on the screen. Like I can’t think of an event on tv that has interpreters that doesn’t need one in person.

      • detalferous
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Think about written English: it’s phonetic.

        How do you learn to RECOGNIZE A WRITTEN WORD when you don’t know what it sounds like, let alone what the letters mean. Or becomes a matter of a hundred thousand different symbols, recognized as a unit, removed from the auditory context.

        I can’t imagine how any deaf person learns to read, to be honest . It’s an astounding feat.

        • fidodo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Don’t you just recognize the sequences? There are plenty of non phonic languages, you just recognize patterns instead of sounds.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Which is why we give deaf students extra attention in schools now…

        The issue is the deaf community was forced to be insular for most of American history. And part of that included the stereotype of “deaf and dumb” where if a person was deaf, they were assumed to be stupid.

        And some older members of that community see the next generation being treated more inclusivly as a negative, because that means their community will shrink if people aren’t forced to only interact with other deaf people. They don’t want integration into the larger community, and they want to force future generations to be segregated as well.

        And theyre kind of right. Most of the people with that line of thought aren’t people you’d want to voluntarily associate with. Wanting to hobble the next generation so you don’t feel lonely is pretty low.

        • Dieinahole@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Dumb used to mean mute. The phrase meant deaf and unable to speak.

          Of course, not being able to communicate leads a lot of people to think someone is stupid, and I imagine that’s why dumb is now synonymous with it.

          I once met a lady with some severe disabilities, no idea what, in a powered wheelchair at a bar. She couldn’t talk, and had a massive keyboard she would sort of flail at until she spelled out the words she was trying to say. It audibly spoke for her.

          This lady has two college degrees, writes books, and does art to help promote the concept that disabled people are people too.

          Pretty damn impressive. Her and her husband’s main gripes were how infantilizing most people are to them. And how expensive good wheelchairs are, lol

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah. When people think of Helen Keller they rarely think socialist scholar and cofounder of the ACLU. They think of a little girl being taught to communicate or a manifestation of disability.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I want to give the flip side here. They used to separate us. There was active division based on how bad your hearing was. If you couldn’t hear with effort and hearing aids you were shunted away as a lost cause. But if you could they would tell your parents not to teach you sign language because you’d prefer it. That’s how me, my sister, my mom, and my grandma were all denied our right to a native language that would’ve been easier for us. They didn’t care that by 60 we’d be deaf as a post because our hearing loss was genetic and degenerative. All English all the time, and no acknowledgment that it took effort to hear.

          The Deaf community can be insular assholes, but I understand it. Our culture is denied to us. Our language is denied to us. And maybe, just maybe part of why we’re oissed off is because we have some points that nobody wants to acknowledge. Like the fact that cochlear implants aren’t some miracle, they’re great, and my grandparents love theirs, but they’re fucking exhausting to use. Hell, I’m a healthy 28 year old and I have to take my hearing aids out after work because they tire me. And for children born too deaf to use auditory communication with hearing parents, it’s disturbing how few of those parents learn sign language. But every CODA (child of deaf adults) is taught spoken language (and they tend to maintain lifelong ties to Deaf culture)

          I’m still mad I wasn’t taught sign as a kid. I’m glad I was given hearing aids but I deserved access to community like me. And if I’d reproduced I would’ve made damn sure my kid was a native signer so that way they’d never grow up in fear of inevitable silence or awkwardly fail to communicate with people who share their disability.

      • amio@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        They don’t. Having your native language be easier than another doesn’t mean you’re struggling significantly.

      • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, subtitles are usually really fast. For most other things that you dont have to read live, reading a bit slower is not really an issue.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’ve hit on a problem that the Deaf community faces. There’s often an entire Deaf society in places. Deaf jobs, Deaf schools (including universities), Deaf media… They do read English but it’s harder and it’s not their primary language (though I’ve heard the internet is helping a lot there).

        But yeah, there are Deaf universities, including prestigious ones like Gallaudet. Nobody teaches medicine or engineering in sign language from what I can see. I did check and I was pleasantly surprised that Gallaudet offered shit like math, biology, and IT with even grad programs in stuff that isn’t explicitly about deafness.