Prison advocates, attorneys and state officials are gearing up to help the estimated 200 prisoners now eligible for parole since a landmark decision last week by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court raised the minimum age to 21 before people could be sentenced to life without parole.

The Committee for Public Counsel Services, the state’s public defender agency, says it is working with the Parole Board to identify prisoners who are newly eligible to be considered for release as the agency prepares at least 40 attorneys to represent them.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240119132143/https://www.wgbh.org/news/local/2024-01-17/what-happens-now-that-massachusetts-has-banned-life-without-parole-for-emerging-adults

  • neptune@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Less crowded prisons? Sounds good. Combating the whole “tried as an adult” which was always kind of bullshit? Sounds good.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      100%, I just want to spread the word on this one because even though the state is putting in some effort to find prisoners who qualify they’re still going to have to know they qualify and file some paperwork to actually make these early releases happen

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Those jailhouse lawyers are going to spread the word on this like wildfire, and inmates will be filing handwritten habeas corpus petitions by the ream if have to. Don’t have to worry about that. Of course thinking about it, I imagine this is not going to affect very many inmates. Hopefully their computer system can tell who they are.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      It doesn’t lead to less crowded jails, it just means that there will be more parole hearings. It doesn’t even guarantee that people that would have received a no parole sentence will actually get released at some point.

    • quindraco
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s not what happened, did you not read the article? They raised the age cutoff from 18 to 21, meaning the only people covered by the decision were actual adults at the time, not juveniles tried as adults.

      • neptune@dmv.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, but I think my general sentiment stands. Sentencing an 18 year old to life? Sentencing a 17 year old as an adult? Both are crazy

  • gaifux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    Trashachusetts being soft on law and order, no shock to anyone. I hate that I was born in that shit hole

  • derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    So a 20 year old mass murderer will get a shot at parole? Isn’t one if the arguments against the death penalty that we can always sentence them to life without parole, and now that is going away?

      • derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I do not believe they can predict the future.

        In any case, I believe some crimes are so heinous, life without parole should be the sentence. I don’t care how old you are. If you have mens rea, that should be the sentence.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          And if society agrees with you at that time, the parole board will make that decision. Taking away their power to decide seems like us trying to predict the future.

          • derf82@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            There is no need to predict the future. It’s the punishment they should get for a heinous premeditated murder.