President Biden is set to unveil a nearly $5 billion investment into dozens of infrastructure projects throughout the country on Thursday during a visit to Superior, Wisconsin.

The investment targets 37 major infrastructure projects throughout the country across at least 12 states, with much of the funding going toward repairing and building new bridges. Among the investments is $600 million to replace the 1-5 bridge that connects Washington and Oregon, $372 million for the Sagamore Bridge in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, and $1.06 billion to replace the Blatnik Bridge that runs between Wisconsin and Minnesota, which is near where Mr. Biden is set to appear for the announcement on Thursday. White House principal deputy press secretary Olivia Dalton called this a “full-circle moment” for the president.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    with much of the funding going toward repairing and building new bridges.

    New bridges are woke. Stop new bridges from grooming our children!

    • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      If Biden is so woke, why is his nickname Sleepy Joe‽‽ Hard to be woke while sleeping!!!1!!eleven!!!

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Im just gonna pull out an old conversation from highschool that kinda fits this.

      “The hell is that?” -Me

      “A suspension bridge?” -Friend

      “No, thats a penis nbridge.” -Me

      “Their building penis bridges to turn the freaking kids gay!” -Other friend across the room

      “See, I aint the only one.”

      For quick context he was playing cities skylines on his laptop and was messing with the terrain tool. The reason he was doing that is cause the power was knocked out by lighting, so we were all waiting for pickup.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Typical libs, spending tax money on woke infrastructure and satanic public improvements. Trump was going to have an even better infrastructure unveiling unlike anything anyone had ever seen, but the libs had to ruin it with all their voting and subsequent transition of power.

    • TheJims@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      It was just two weeks away, the biggest and best infrastructure project in the history of ever, believe me.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m with you. I would much rather have satanic infrastructure and woke public improvements. I also propose we start calling polling places “Gay Polling Locations,” too.

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah. Tons.

        I mean, I’ll be the first person to say more should be done… but that doesn’t mean good things haven’t happened. Just because our expectations are (reasonably) high doesn’t mean we can’t acknowledge some progress.

        Acknowledge the good while also demanding more.

        • Compactor9679
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yea? Like what?

          Border is a joke Economy sucks People more devided then ever Etc…

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    I am all for Infrastructure.

    Though $600 million for that I-5 bridge over the Columbia River seems very low. The Narrows Bridge across the Puget Sound cost like $800 million in 2007 and I feel like that was a smaller project. I am sure there’s some sort of cost matching with WA and OR funding involved but that in particular caught my eye having personal context to that bridge.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Washington — President Biden is set to unveil a nearly $5 billion investment into dozens of infrastructure projects throughout the country on Thursday during a visit to Superior, Wisconsin.

    The investment targets 37 major infrastructure projects throughout the country across at least 12 states, with much of the funding going toward repairing and building new bridges.

    White House principal deputy press secretary Olivia Dalton called this a “full-circle moment” for the president.

    “He first visited the Blatnik Bridge about two years ago after the State of the Union in 2022 to talk about the important investments we’re making through the bipartisan infrastructure law in America,” Dalton said aboard Air Force One.

    During the visit, the president is set to meet with small business owners who the White House says are expected to benefit from the new Blatnik Bridge.

    “Joe Biden bet on the American worker while Donald Trump blamed the American worker,” UAW President Shawn Fain said in his announcement during the UAW’s political convention in Washington, D.C. "We need to know who’s gonna sit in the most powerful seat in the world and help us win as a united working class.


    The original article contains 411 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 54%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Which part? I was thinking exactly the same for the Sagamore Bridge and had to look it up. Apparently the rotary was 2004 and the facelift was like 2013. It’s just that replacing the bridge has been talked about forever. Usually someone tries to say it’s an intentional bottleneck to reduce traffic on the Cape. What morons.

  • Odelay42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    These projects should come with strict minimum wage requirements and maximum profit margins for the corporations that run them.

    If you pay young people 40 bucks an hour to work on bridges, they will come flocking for these good jobs and regard the fed positively for life.

    But they’re being institututed by dems so they’ll pay 17 an hour, work nights, and give the CEO leeway to pocket 15 million bucks a year.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You may be right, but let’s not cast aspersions without reason. No sense creating a villain where one doesn’t (yet) exist.

      It’s okay to celebrate the win and also remain vigilant.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is not so much ‘more cars’ as it is ‘less cars plunging into rivers during a bridge collapse.’

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I can only speak for my local Bridge …… they want to replace the old Sagamore bridge to get the same number of lanes. Replace the WPA project from 1935 with a modern one. Replace two extra narrow lanes with no breakdown with lanes that meet code. Replace opposing traffic right next to each other with a median. Replace a bicycle path on sidewalk with a separate bike path. Replace a low speed limit bridge with the same speed limit as the roads it joins.

        Most importantly replace the common summertime traffic report of “40+ mile backup to the Sagamore Bridge” with …. Much less

        It’ll be helluva safer and a huge win for the environment by easing the legendary traffic jams