The wiki link quotes a Reuters articles that states:
“The six-page dossier, seen by Reuters, alleges that some 190 UNRWA employees, including teachers, have doubled as Hamas or Islamic Jihad militants. It has names and pictures for 11 them.” That seems like no documention if they do not even have a name for 179/190 of these claimed operatives. What I am confused about is what facts have to do with “agreement or disagreement,” especially when they have all proven your initial belief incorrect and answered your query, what are facts supposed to be agreeing/disagreeing with?
the first link says only 12 are accused of being complicit in 10/7. the rest are alleged to be “Hamas or Islamis jihad militants”, which sounds pretty unproveable.
I can’t tell if you are in agreement or disagreement. Btw, the first wiki article you sent says 190 are documented. Then the rest say other things.
The wiki link quotes a Reuters articles that states: “The six-page dossier, seen by Reuters, alleges that some 190 UNRWA employees, including teachers, have doubled as Hamas or Islamic Jihad militants. It has names and pictures for 11 them.” That seems like no documention if they do not even have a name for 179/190 of these claimed operatives. What I am confused about is what facts have to do with “agreement or disagreement,” especially when they have all proven your initial belief incorrect and answered your query, what are facts supposed to be agreeing/disagreeing with?
Agree deez nuts. gottem mom
the first link says only 12 are accused of being complicit in 10/7. the rest are alleged to be “Hamas or Islamis jihad militants”, which sounds pretty unproveable.