• sanzky@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    they wanted to be irrelevant in the European market for chat applications?

    • gregorum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      no, merely considered irrelevant— for legal purposes. why? read the headline.

      • sanzky@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Im not sure you understands how this work. but anyway… they can do whatever with their service. I (or any person I know) dont plan to use it 🤷

          • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Insulting people isn’t nice. The only rule on this understand is to be(e) nice. This is not appropriate behavior for our instance. You didn’t need to insult someone to make your point. I’m giving you a 7 day ban to think things over.

          • Norgur@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Dude, you tried to lead OP off on a weird tangent that

            a) they didn’t follow you on and
            b) was nonsense and lacked understanding on your part from the get go.

            Stop insulting people as being stupid when clearly you didn’t (want to) understand what was said and just tried to tell people who told personal anecdotes that their anecdotes are wrong…

      • Big P@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They must’ve been playing the long game then, iMessage has been irrelevant in Europe since before this law existed. Apple truly thinks of eveything