• FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    If I would have said 30 years ago that people in the future would pay money for a device that lets companies basically spy on you, and then they can also sell the data, I would have been branded a lunatic and sent for psychiatric help. Yet, here we are.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re talking about a device which is a full-color high-definition surveillance camera that works at night and can be viewed from literally anywhere in the world and can be configured to send you alerts based on seeing people/animals/packages/whatever. That only costs them an inflation adjusted $13.

      I don’t really think the “they wouldn’t believe this shit” argument really applies with how rapidly tech has changed.

    • AnarchoDakosaurus@toast.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      That and ring doorbells being used as a big data harvesting point for the police.

      The surveillance culture we have is so normalized now people don’t even care that their security camera is more of a corporate livestream then a secure loop. But hey, how else an I gonna pust pictures of the guy stealing my 3rd Amazon package of the day.

    • SpeakinTelnet@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      30 years ago was 1994, the internet was quickly becoming a thing and if you would have told them that companies would eventually offer extra services if you chose to store your data with them, they would have believed you because that’s how the banking system worked for centuries prior.