• fuzzzerd@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Seems the second group is a vocal minority. This feature helps the first group, but doesn’t help the second group.

    According to Signal, the first group is the larger group and this helps the most users of Signal.

    Could it be better? Sure. This is still a good step in terms of privacy, even though it doesn’t really improve anonymity.

    • preasket@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Personally, I care about the phone number requirement not because I don’t want to reveal it to Signal servers, but because it limits access to Signal for people in countries that block their SMS service - registration messages just don’t arrive

      • XTornado@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s specific to signal? Like they want to block people registering or what’s up with that SMS block?

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not specific to Signal. I believe he was referring to places where Twilio doesn’t serve, for example because of sanctions.