• HelixDab2
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sure, I like it.

    You also run into problems with news media that have a conservative bias; they trend significantly less factual than news media that have a liberal bias. For instance, despite being quite far to the left, Jacobin is very good at having factual information. Even Salon–which should not be mistaken for a reputable news source–does better than Newsmax or OAN. If you look for sources that have a left bias and rate “high” for factual reporting, you end up with a pretty large list; when you switch that to a right bias, you list is about 1/4 - 1/3 of the size.

    It’s worth noting that there are NO sites that have a left or right bias that are “very high” for factual reporting, there are five sources that are center-left that are very high (and no center-right sources), and all of the other “very high” sources are least biased or specifically pro-science. IMO, sources that rate below “mostly factual” shouldn’t be used, since it’s too much of a pain in the ass to track down their sources and verify their claims.

    • PizzaMan
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Agreed. But like I said, never going to happen because using shitty misinformation sources is critical to maintaining beliefs in conservative ideals.

      • PizzaMan
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Today’s dismissive label of the day from momo is “fucking hacks”, how fun!