Enterprise Linux on desktop?

Anyone using enterprise Linux on their desktop such as RHEL, Alma, Rocky, CentOS etc.?

I’m curious if it’s easy to use for this purpose or if the older packages are a pain.

@linux

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    You can use btrfs with any distro. It’s just easier to install on some than others. Ubuntu and Mint will automatically create subvolumes for root and home if you install on a btrfs partition. With Debian, you have to manually create and mount all of the subvolumes before starting the installation.

    • Virulent@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can’t really use it with redhat. You can swap the kernel and install the user space tools, but then you won’t get support from redhat.

      • Shareni@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Is anyone here using RHEL support, and is also able to mess around with their partitions?

        The free licences are unsupported, and I doubt people are dropping $300+ for RHEL every few for their personal desktop.

        • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          They don’t have any devs to support it. The one dev who an idea about btrfs left for Oracle, from what I’ve read.

          Btrfs is rather nice in the correct scenarios, and lack of btrfs is one reason I’m moving away from CentOS servers.

        • biribiri11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It was available as a technology preview in RHEL 6 and 7, but dropped in 8. There apparently wasn’t much demand for it, and the reputation of BTRFS isn’t exactly synonymous with the image of reliability Red Hat strives for. There’s also the idea of maintenance and support burdens, and Red Hat themselves have launched their own stab at a fs with an integrated volume manager called Stratisd, though IBM supposedly absorbed the team that was working on it for their own products.

          • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Just in time for Fedora to use it by default and create some interest. I get the maintenance burden though, RHEL patches their kernel like crazy. They still use XFS as default which I think is pretty unique at this point.