• NeuromancerOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Can you show me where he was convicted? Must have missed that.

          • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            He owes 91 million for defaming the woman he raped. You radicalized cultists are footing the bill. How can you miss this?

            • NeuromancerOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              That isn’t a conviction. Do you not understand civil vs criminal court?

                • NeuromancerOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  . I get you want to use new speak but words have meanings. It’s how we convey ideas. The jury specifically did not find him liable for rape. Even if they had, it’s not called a conviction.

                  • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    A jury found him liable. Then trump defamed his rape victim, twice. A jury found him liable for 5 million, then 81 million. Now he has defamed his rape victim again, and will be sued again. And you brainwashed cultists will pay off his crime bills AGAIN.

                  • nac82
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Lmao, you didn’t use newspeak accurately. It involves the process of reducing available words.

                    Kinda like what your objective in that conversation is. Except that it still isn’t even close to the term you are trying to apply