dantheclamman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoVinyl records outsell CDs for the second year runningwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square381fedilinkarrow-up1711arrow-down114
arrow-up1697arrow-down1external-linkVinyl records outsell CDs for the second year runningwww.theverge.comdantheclamman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square381fedilink
minus-squarespyd3r@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down8·edit-23 months agoMost CDs pressed after the mid-90’s are audiological garbage not worth paying for. If the waveform looks like this, I ain’t buying it:
minus-squareMrScottyTay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·3 months agoThey usually have a higher bitrate than you can get from streaming. There’s not one CD I have that I immediately tell the difference in quality of I switch between streaming (or even a standard mp3 actually) and a CD. CD wins every time.
minus-squarearclinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·3 months agoSo you have a crap master. Compare the same master between compact disc and vinyl when making your judgments.
minus-squareZstom6IP@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoalot of people dont work with audio, but i actually have, you may be downvoted, but you are correct.
Most CDs pressed after the mid-90’s are audiological garbage not worth paying for.
If the waveform looks like this, I ain’t buying it:
They usually have a higher bitrate than you can get from streaming. There’s not one CD I have that I immediately tell the difference in quality of I switch between streaming (or even a standard mp3 actually) and a CD. CD wins every time.
So you have a crap master. Compare the same master between compact disc and vinyl when making your judgments.
alot of people dont work with audio, but i actually have, you may be downvoted, but you are correct.