So says the criminal lol. Maybe Don Poorleone should take care of his own shit first.
What crime has Trump been convicted of?
He has a half billion dollar judgment against him for crimes he’s been convicted of.
Those are not crimes. Do you know what a crime is? A civil case is not a criminal case. None of those cases would have prevailed in a criminal court.
His actions were still illegal. Just because they chose to prosecute as civil, doesn’t mean he didn’t commit crimes.
lol… actually it does. Words have meanings. I get you lefties love 1984, but it’s not a manual on how to run the country.
Trump has not been convicted of a crime.
Trump has been convicted of at the very least 17 crimes dumb dumb.
Cite. And be civil, especially when you are wrong. Show these convictions.
By conservative logic as applied to Democrats, merely asserting something makes it true. So Biden is guilty of “dereliction of duty” because he’s “ignoring” the border, of “treason” because of his unproved involvement in his son’s foreign business deals, or most relevantly, is guilty of commandeering classified documents despite not being charged for anything.
So, merely applying conservative logic to conservatives, which is only fair, would mean that Trump is a criminal given his eighty-eight indictments, many of which are federal charges.
Political charges. Notice how the Democrats keep failing in court against Trump. Their attempts to stop him from running have only made him more popular.
If Trump wins, it is because of the banana republic that the Democrats tried to create. Had they just ignored him, he wouldn’t have gained in popularity.
The charges against Biden are also political then. Notice how Republicans have failed to pin Joe Biden for the crimes of his son. That’s why those charges are political. They’re certainly not backed by evidence.
When Biden wins, you’ll see that Trump’s fascist movement (I use that term knowing what it means probably more deeply than you) will never simply wither away on the vine form neglect. It must be rhetorically confronted and humiliated at every chance.
Well the classified documents they stated he was too incompetent to be charged. Not that he didn’t commit the crime but he was too feeble minded to be prosecuted. Biden isn’t going to win. Whatever his name, the Kennedy is going to pull votes from Biden. That’ll give Trump the chance to win the electoral college and clean up the decay in Washington.
If Trump loses, I’m retiring and moving to Florida. With my capital gains, I’ll be fine.
Removed by mod
This isn’t a theory. It’s a fairly well known stance. It’s been all over the news. People are tired of Biden and all the progressive policies. People want to get back to be able to afford to live.
Trump and Co. are the decay, fiflth, refuse, excrement of society generally, but of Washington especially. The country’s capital is a pit of vipers, but the profiteering, violent rhetoric, and evident narcissism of Trump’s administration was such a tarnished foil that even Mitch McConnell seems like an upstanding guy.
Well I look forward to the success we had under Trump. You must be one of the few whos doing better under Biden.
Since you like wordplay, Trump said law and order yet he broke the law and was convicted of it. Civil laws are still laws.
You’re not convicted of civil actions. He is liable. It’s not a criminal offense. Have you ever had a parking ticket or a speeding ticket? Does that make you a criminal ? The answer is no. Those are both civil infractions. It isn’t word play. You’re just using the words incorrectly.
Right. We should use words correctly. Trump is a fraudster who obtained millions of dollars through false statements and false documents but not a criminal since the fraud he committed wasn’t criminal fraud. Much better. Just like a parking ticket even.
I’m fine with fraudster. That’s an opinion.
Just coming back to this. In addition to the multiple times his organizations have been found guilty for fraud, in addition to being found liable for rape, he has been convinced by a jury of his peers on 34 distinct felonies. He is a felon.
It is fair to call him a felon now.
Yes, but he has been a criminal for some time now
Anyone else like that the dude who posted this shit’s name is from a genre that openly shows the flaws in capitalism’s race to the bottom?
Is like being hit in the face and still not getting the message lol
Can you try that in English? It doesn’t make any sense at all.
It makes sense bud, comprehension seems to be a you issue.
No. It was very poorly written. It made zero sense
I understood it, you didn’t therefore it’s a comprehension issue which again is a you issue.
Sure you did.
Removed by mod
The joke here revolves around the irony and contradiction in the situation described. The character named “Neuromancer” refers to William Gibson’s novel “Neuromancer,” which is a foundational work in the cyberpunk genre. Cyberpunk fiction often explores themes of advanced technology and cybernetics, set against a backdrop of dystopian futures dominated by large corporations and the decay of society—essentially, highlighting the negative aspects and potential downfall of unchecked capitalism and technological advancement.
The irony comes from someone named after a genre that critiques capitalism (cyberpunk, through the book “Neuromancer”) posting something that seems oblivious to or in conflict with those critiques. The joke suggests that it’s ironic and somewhat foolish for someone who has chosen a name symbolizing critique of capitalism to then engage in behavior that seems uncritical of, or even complicit in, the flaws of capitalism that cyberpunk literature aims to highlight.
The phrase “like being hit in the face and still not getting the message” amplifies this irony. It’s a metaphor for being directly confronted with the consequences or criticisms of something (in this case, capitalism’s negative aspects as explored in cyberpunk literature) but still failing to understand or acknowledge them.
Its been a while since I read it, but iirc, the whole evil capitalism thing wasnt really there in Neuromancer, that only really came in later books in the genre, and it isnt strict.
If you want a pro-capitalism cyberpunk book, the Unincorporated Man is pretty good. Follows a full on horse shoe theory society that went so hard into capitalism they came out on the other side into future-communism, and the hero is a modern billionaire that got frozen for thousands of years, and the entire plot is a lawsuit over him never being incorporated. Brilliant read.
I’ll have to check that one out.
I took a college class on Phillip and William. Anti-capitalism wasn’t brought up once. I’ll have to go re-read some of his interviews. I always got the vibe he was more libertarian like dick. That would be the exact opposite of anti-capitalism.
I don’t think capitalism is flawed. I have done well under it as all my peers. It’s the best system to take yourself from poverty to success.
It’s the only system prove to work time and time again.
Also Wintermute is not a critique on capitalism. Have you read the book?
Yes, William Gibson, in his work, particularly in the novel “Neuromancer” and other stories within the cyberpunk genre, offers a critique of capitalism. His critiques are not always direct condemnations but are embedded within the settings, characters, and plots of his stories. Gibson’s narratives often unfold in dystopian futures where society is heavily influenced by technology and dominated by large corporations. These settings highlight several issues associated with capitalism, such as:
-
Corporatization and Monopolization: Gibson’s worlds are often controlled by powerful corporations that have more influence than governments, showcasing the dangers of monopolization and corporatization in a capitalist society. This reflects concerns about the concentration of power and wealth and the erosion of democratic institutions.
-
Economic Inequality: The stark contrast between the wealthy elite and the impoverished masses in Gibson’s stories draws attention to the issue of economic inequality, a common critique of capitalism. His works suggest that technological advancement and capitalist pursuits further exacerbate this divide.
-
Commodification of Everything: Gibson explores how, in a highly capitalist future, everything becomes commodified, including human relationships and body parts (through cybernetics). This critique points to the reduction of human values to market values.
-
Technological Exploitation: While not exclusively a critique of capitalism, Gibson’s depiction of the exploitation of technology for profit and power reflects concerns about capitalist societies prioritizing technological advancement and economic growth over ethical considerations and human well-being.
-
Environmental Degradation: Although not the central theme of his work, the dystopian worlds Gibson creates often feature environmental degradation as a backdrop, suggesting a critique of industrial capitalism’s unsustainable exploitation of natural resources.
Through these themes, Gibson’s work contributes to a broader discourse on the pitfalls and ethical concerns associated with capitalist societies, particularly regarding their future trajectory in the face of advancing technology and corporatization.
I disagree. If you look through Gibson’s interviews and hires, I’ve yet to find any sort of comment on capitalism.
The closest quote I can remember is how in the future we will be defined more by the products we own rather than a nation. Paraphrasing of course.
Gibson wrote about dystopian futures because that’s a common theme for science fiction. I would love to see how you think wintemute is related to capitalism. Wintermute is trying to merge with nueromancer. Wintermute wears mask since with the Turing locks it can’t form an identify.
I see no capitalism pro or con in that statement.
It’s essential to understand that literary critique and thematic exploration often occur within the narrative and structure of the work itself, rather than through explicit authorial commentary. Here’s how the elements mentioned can indeed be seen as engaging with capitalism, even if not overtly stated by Gibson in interviews:
-
Products Defining Identity Over Nationality: This observation directly ties into a critique of capitalist consumer culture, where the value and identity of individuals are increasingly determined by their consumption patterns and possessions rather than their cultural, national, or personal attributes. This is a critique of how capitalism commodifies identities and relationships.
-
Dystopian Futures as a Common Theme: Gibson’s dystopian settings, where corporations have more power than governments, serve as a critique of capitalist systems taken to an extreme. This is not just a backdrop for storytelling but a deliberate choice to explore the consequences of unchecked corporate power and wealth concentration, key issues within capitalist systems.
-
Wintermute and Neuromancer’s Relationship: The narrative of Wintermute wanting to merge with Neuromancer, and its struggle with identity due to Turing locks, can be interpreted as a metaphor for the dehumanizing aspects of capitalism. Wintermute’s desire for unification and overcoming its limitations mirrors the capitalist drive for growth and overcoming market constraints, often at the cost of ethical considerations and human values.
-
The Absence of Direct Commentary Does Not Equal Approval: Just because Gibson doesn’t explicitly state his views on capitalism in interviews doesn’t mean his work supports or is neutral towards capitalism. The settings, characters, and conflicts he constructs offer a platform to question and critique the ramifications of capitalist systems, particularly regarding technological advancement, social inequality, and corporate governance.
-
Implicit Critiques Are Still Critiques: Literature, especially speculative fiction, allows authors to explore and critique societal trends and systems implicitly. Gibson’s narratives, filled with cybernetic enhancements, virtual realities, and corporate dominion, prompt readers to consider the ethical and social implications of these developments within a capitalist framework.
While Gibson may not frequently vocalize direct critiques of capitalism outside his fiction, the themes, settings, and character dynamics within his work offer a nuanced exploration of capitalism’s impacts on society, technology, and identity. These elements of his storytelling serve as a critique, inviting readers to reflect on the potential directions and consequences of capitalist societies.
Pearls before swine.
Whoever wrote that hasn’t read much on Gibson. They are reaching to form a conclusion they want. The growing corporation power is a common theme in futurism.
ETA: traveling today. Wintermute is a nod to Phillip k dick. It’s from dicks book valis. Gibson and Dick share common themes in their books which is typical of the genre. Dick often wrote about what is real. That is part of the struggle Wintermute is going through in nureomancer. While I like gibbons work. Dick is the much better author.
-
-
Removed by mod
I’ll give you that. That is a fair critique.
Removed by mod
I don’t.
All indications otherwise.