Both President Biden and the White House have enabled the Fediverse integration on Threads.

  • leadore@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I don’t consider being on Threads as being “on the fediverse”. My definition of the fediverse is servers that follow the Activity Pub protocol to interact with each other. You might disagree with that definition, but Threads only lets us “follow” (view-only) certain of their accounts (only about 2000 out of millions) from Mastodon. Those accounts do not see any replies to their post from the fediverse, or any fediverse posts at all for that matter–we are invisible to them. So no, he’s not “on the fediverse”, he’s on Threads. I doubt he knows the fediverse even exists.

    • Sean Tilley@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thing is, for federation to work, his team had to opt into it. The fact that his statuses and profile render natively in Mastodon and Akkoma are a pretty strong start.

      I’d like to see Meta put their money where their mouths are, and finish the integration. I think we’ll probably see that happen sooner rather than later.

      • leadore@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Personally I hope they never do, though it does look likely. Like many pre-November '22 old-time Mastodon et.al. fedizens, I came to the fediverse specifically because I didn’t want to have anything with FB/Meta/Twitter or the other commercial, “engagement”-based, enshittified social media.

        It feels like the fediverse is being gentrified, with half of it eagerly welcoming their new overlords (why don’t they just join Threads?) and the other half resisting. The half that doesn’t federate with Meta will move on, like people priced out of their own neighborhoods by gentrification, and become the new “real fediverse” where people can go to live free from corporate interference.

        • Sean Tilley@lemmy.mlOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          It feels like the fediverse is being gentrified

          As someone who has repeatedly seen cities become gentrified (first Peoria, Illinois, then San Francisco, then Phoenix), I get what you’re trying to say, but also don’t think it’s an appropriate metaphor.

          The half that doesn’t federate with Meta will move on, like people priced out of their own neighborhoods by gentrification, and become the new “real fediverse” where people can go to live free from corporate interference.

          Frankly, I think this is a bit melodramatic. The Anti-Threads part of the Fediverse will stay in their isolated bubble with little to no change, while the rest of the network continues to grow or change. It’s not like operational costs are skyrocketing, or that hosting will become any more scarce or more difficult. It’s not like the servers have to move to a different neighborhood. Gentrification is predicated on the finiteness of physical space and affordable places to live.

          and become the new “real fediverse” where people can go to live free from corporate interference.

          This is probably news to you, but there’s not even a coherent, all-encompassing definition for what the Fediverse even is. The idea that there’s a “real Fediverse” vs “Fake Fediverse” glosses over all kinds of history and nuance. The best anyone’s gotten to defining it is by specifying protocols and interoperability, but even that doesn’t quite cover it.

          The Fediverse isn’t just the parts you like, minus the parts you don’t like.

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s not like operational costs are skyrocketing, or that hosting will become any more scarce or more difficult.

            That remains to be seen. There are multiple ways a single huge instance could drive up costs for everyone else, especially when there isn’t organic growth that allows developers to find creative workarounds to firehose problems.

            Lemmy has been seeing federation-desync issues over the last couple of weeks due to a bug in kbin being amplified by Lemmy.world. I imaging a similar issue but with a fully federated Threads would simply ddos most fediverse instances out of existence.

          • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I get what you’re trying to say, but also don’t think it’s an appropriate metaphor.

            You’re also screamingly White; do you really think you have any latitude, any ground to opine on what is and isn’t gentrification when the odds err closer to 1 that you’ve uncritically participated in this process before?

            Y’know, if I had a watch on, I’d be looking at my wrist really condescendingly right about now.

            • Sean Tilley@lemmy.mlOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              You’re also screamingly White

              Just because I have privilege doesn’t mean I haven’t experienced harsh realities that are relevant to this context. The idea that a person’s race automatically qualifies or disqualifies them to speak on a subject without context or nuance is just silly.

              You’re out here mad because a dude expressed that it’s stupid to compare server hosting for commodity open source communication software to societal decay caused by landlords, real estate developers, and people with four times the local income all rushing into a place and pricing out the people who already lived there. Y’know, something that actually has a real and tangible material effect.

              • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Who said ‘mad’? I asked you a question; "do you really think you have any latitude". Can’t say your response surprises me either. I think your privilege absolutely disqualifies you from speaking without immense disclaimer-- which you didn’t provide-- because you people can never be trusted to even properly parse the difference between prejudice and racism in definition, theory, or practice; so why should I trust you to properly define what is and isn’t ‘gentrification’? Especially considering the list of cities you give only gives me even more reason to believe you’ve participated in meatspace gentrification just as eagerly as you preach it over here? Tuhhhhhh.

                Fact of the matter is, you and your little redditor weasel friends have done an admirable job at scuzzing the place up in State Department rot and water-bearing for all manner of genociders, war criminals, and merchants of death-- Meta included among at least two of three in that count. Their presence alone on the fediverse spreads that same Five-Eyed rot. That you either can’t perceive, or won’t perceive that, leads me to believe that yes. ‘Gentrification’ is exactly what they’re doing. What you’re doing. Just virtual this time; and if you believe corporate takeover of the digital commons doesn’t count, you’d just be proving my point even more about your lack of standing or right to speak on the subject. They will embrace, extend, and then extinguish the fediverse as we know it, and expect you to pay for what comes after. Enjoy your dystopia, settler. You’re no longer invited to discuss with me; not 'til you’ve done any kind of meaningful self-crit and preferentially some objective learning about the sociological place from which you speak.

                • Sean Tilley@lemmy.mlOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Nice goalpost shifting, but miss me with your inane rambling, projection, and misplaced sense of entitlement. Just block me and move on.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        If Google killed XMPP, how come some enterprise communication products (off the top of my head I can name two that are successful at least in Europe) use it?

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          There is XMPP the protocol which is indeed still widely used by commercial entities, and there is XMPP the open federated network, also called Jabber, which is still alive but Google did kneecap it pretty hard back then.

          • woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            XMPP as used in the enterprise communication product my employer uses (AFAIK based on the common open source implementation) sucks as much on mobile as Xabber which I used back in the day. I get notifications 30 minutes late if at all. That thing killed itself by not adapting to smartphones.

            • poVoq@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              That’s a bad implementation then. Modern open-source XMPP works great on mobile, no problems with notifications at all on Android. iOS is more of a mixed bag, but that is solely Apple’s fault and applies to all messengers other than iMessage.

              • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                That’s a bad implementation then. Modern open-source XMPP works great on mobile

                The issue was the state of mobile clients when XMPP died in the mainstream and state of the art was crap like Xabber. Conversations was better but too little, too late.

                iOS is more of a mixed bag, but that is solely Apple’s fault and applies to all messengers other than iMessage.

                Telegram works flawlessly pretty much everywhere, including iOS which my mom uses.

                • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Well, Monal on iOS doesn’t work worse than Telegram on iOS, so then apparently it’s flawless as well. I am not an iOS user, but I heard complaints about Telegram on iOS as well regarding notifications.

                  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Well, Monal on iOS doesn’t work worse than Telegram on iOS, so then apparently it’s flawless as well.

                    Again: The current state is irrelevant when discussing the time frame when Google allegedly killed it. The state of Jabber and its clients was just abhorrently bad back in the day. That was the reason the world moved to WhatsApp. Google Talk has always been a niche product. That’s why it’s dead.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      If I can follow some mainstream entertainment accounts from Mastodon, I’m fine with that. I dislike having to log onto Twitter or Threads just to find out what some motorsports teams are up to.