• DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s not wizardry, it’s that our political/legal system has been avoiding the question of “Can you indict a President (current or former)?” ever since Nixon.

    I believe we answered this question back in the 1770’s when we sent our king a letter telling him to fuck off, then beat his army and sent them packing. Then we re-answered this question in 1812 when we fought off the Brits again and Canada, who burnt down our original white house, but ultimately told the king to fuck off again ans sent his army and allies packing again. Then we told Jefferson Davis and his supporters fuck off when he tried to take over as the unelected “President”, aka King/Tyrant/Despot/Dictator, although with all of the Confederate “heritage”, flags, statues, and terrorist groups (KKK) that still exist it doesn’t seem like we told the Confederates to fuck off hard enough, we probably should have let Sherman tell each and every one of them “fuck off” in person.

    Anyway, my point is that we’ve already had this discussion three times and the answer to every King and wannabe King has been “fuck off” followed by a lot of killing, I’m not so sure we should be going for a forth time, especially not for an orange diaper wearing nepo baby traitor.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I believe we answered this question back in the 1770’s

      It has been answered endlessly. Power doesn’t care, it just wants power. The fact that the entire political establishment including both parties has been taking this path for literally fifty fucking years (Nixon stepped down in '74) really speaks to the idea that they want to play a game and pretend this question hasn’t been answered before.

      We need to look forward, not backward.

      Obligatory “Thanks, Obama.”

      • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely

        Lord Acton (1887)

        The full quote is pretty poignant as well:

        “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority; still more when you superadd the tendency of the certainty of corruption by authority.”

        Lord Acton had some pretty good bangers on this topic:

        “Despotic power is always accompanied by corruption of morality.”

        And:

        “Authority that does not exist for Liberty is not authority but force.”

        Also:

        “Everybody likes to get as much power as circumstances allow, and nobody will vote for a self-denying ordinance.”

        Lastly:

        “Absolute power demoralizes.”

    • TransplantedSconie
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sherman should have been allowed to raze the south in a zig-zag pattern for 10 years straight. We wouldn’t be putting up with the bullshit we are dealing with today.