• aidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I know, that’s not what I said though. I said the Romans did discriminate, against bottoms.

    • melpomenesclevage
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah but it was more of a condition than a social wedge issue. Hierarchal toxic masculinity shit, not so much class persecution, and didn’t in a lot of cases (I might be remembering a Greek thing, so easy to mix them up when roman culture is mostly a shitty port of Greek culture) topping/bottoming get based on age? Or did that not carry over?

            • melpomenesclevage
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              As in I’m saying ancient Greeks discriminated saw the act as demeaning/lesser, but did not, I don’t think, see it as an identity, abd what role one performed was based on status/age/whatever.

              One was not a bottom (though perhaps was x’s bottom), but did bottoming.

              • aidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Iirc, at least the Romans wrote rhymes insulting people who were especially career bottoms, but yeah I don’t know what they did as they got older.

                • melpomenesclevage
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Like I said; I’m working from half remembered history of Greece, whose culture Rome’s was a shitty port of, but I wouldn’t put it past the romans to add hierarchal shittiness.