This essay says that inheritance is harmful and if possible you should “ban inheritance completely”. You see these arguments a lot, as well as things like “prefer composition to inheritance”. A lot of these arguments argue that in practice inheritance has problems. But they don’t preclude inheritance working in another context, maybe with a better language syntax. And it doesn’t explain why inheritance became so popular in the first place. I want to explore what’s fundamentally challenging about inheritance and why we all use it anyway.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    OK, I think I’m getting it.

    A product is a set that this is the result of an ordered cartesian products.

    struct Car {
      make: String,
      model: String,
      seats: u8,
    } 
    

    Car = String X String x u8.


    An enum is a series of "or"s.

    enum Animal {
      Dog,
      Cat,
      Giraffe,
      Chimpanzee,
    }
    

    can also be thought of as Animal = Dog | Cat | Giraffe | Chimpanzee. Where Dog is a type that only has single value in its set aka Animal = {1} | {2} | {3} | {4}, but it could also be strings, or other objects. Rust however allows more complex objects:

    enum ComplexEnum {
        Nothing,
        Something(u32),
        LotsOfThings {
            usual_struct_stuff: bool,
            blah: String,
        }
    }
    

    In this case is Something(u32) the equivalent of any “tagged” u32, meaning in memory it’s something like a Tag + 32 bits where Tag is a constant string of bits, maybe itself a u32? Wouldn’t that make it a product type?
    But then LotsOfThings is itself a product type LotsOfThings = bool x String.

    So to put it all together ComplexEnum = Nothing | TaggedU32 | (bool x String)? Is that correct?

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    • arendjr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      So to put it all together ComplexEnum = Nothing | TaggedU32 | (bool x String)? Is that correct?

      Pretty much, yeah. But just be aware the tags are effectively unique constants, so each has only one value. For consistency I would write it as:

      ComplexEnum = Nothing | Something(u32) | LotsOfThings(bool x String)

      In this notation,Something(u32) could also be written as 1 x u32 because tags are constants.

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        OK, so finally I get it. It’s pity none of the blogs I’ve read or wikipedia articles in existence spell it out this way. Instead it’s a bunch of math mumbo jumbo.

        Thanks for helping me reach understanding 🙏 And thanks to @Kacarott@feddit.de too.

        Anti Commercial-AI license