Talk about having essentially forgotten about it. I bet!

I suppose they only did it now due to some license agreement expiring?

  • Gamers_Mate@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sorry we cannot afford to pay the DRM licensing fee. As a result we will no longer be able to inconvenience our customers or prevent people who were never going to pay for our game anyway from playing.

    • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s twice as funny in this game because they added Denuvo a year after release. Meaning all pirates got the game DRM free on day one while paying customers got Denuvo patched in.

      Absolute waste of money.

      • arudesalad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think they did the same thing with anno 1800, only difference is they haven’t cracked it yet so no dlc on the pirated version.

        • Dizzy Devil Ducky
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Stuff like this makes me wish I was smart enough to be one of those DRM crackers.

          • Nutteman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Same cause the only one who really knows how to do it with Denuvo is kinda bonkers in the brain zone

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Enshitification of DRM moving to subscription based ended up being the most pro consumer move in the long run.

  • tuckerm@supermeter.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    2 months ago

    I suppose they only did it now due to some license agreement expiring?

    Yep, if I understand it right, Denuvo charges an annual fee to be used. That’s why you always see it getting removed after the game loses relevance, when sales aren’t enough to justify paying for Denuvo anymore.

    Kind of weird how, because Bethesda (and other publishers) are Denuvo’s consumer, this particular anti-consumer license agreement is actually benefiting the players, haha.

    • CausticFlames@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 months ago

      Plastering it all over social media, I guess.

      But honestly the word “quietly” being anywhere in any article’s title or anything has become the biggest red flag for just click baiting the piss out of something. I almost always take the title and throw it out the window after I see quietly in any title.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Weird coincidence, I’m in the middle of this rn. Haven’t played Starfield but this is one of my favorite Bethesda titles outside of Doom and Wolfenstein

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          TIL!

          Edit to make @Lols@lemm.ee’ comment make sense again:

          I originally answered “definitely not the original ones!” ør something to that effect, but found that it might be needlessly combative, so I changed it to just TIL 😁

          • Lols [they/them]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            i assumed they were talking about the bethesda published reboots, what with them being significantly more popular than the earlier games

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              2 months ago

              I mean, if someone says “Doom and Wolfenstein” without specifying “Doom Eternal” and “Wolfenstein: Youngblood” (which I had to look up, BTW), I’m thinking of Id.

              • Lols [they/them]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                I mean, if someone says “Doom and Wolfenstein” without specifying “Doom Eternal” and “Wolfenstein: Youngblood” (which I had to look up, BTW), I’m thinking of Id.

                that makes sense, especially since Doom eternal is in fact still developed by id

                Wolfenstein and Doom have both reached significantly more people since they got adopted by zenimax though, so most folks who actually played the games will have probably gotten introduced to them as Bethesda published games

                “Wolfenstein: Youngblood” (which I had to look up, BTW),

                lol ok

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              what with them being significantly more popular than the earlier games

              Dude! The original ones were cultural touchstones in a market that wasn’t yet oversaturated. They literally invented and defined the whole genre!

              More people might be playing the new ones NOW, but the original ones were undoubtedly MUCH more popular in their time.

              • Lols [they/them]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                2 months ago

                Dude! The original ones were cultural touchstones in a market that wasn’t yet oversaturated. They literally invented and defined the whole genre!

                the original ones were undoubtedly MUCH more popular in their time.

                i mean sure, but that also doesnt matter to the point i was making

                More people might be playing the new ones NOW

                which is why most folks are probably not talking about the old games when they say they like wolfenstein and doom

                • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  which is why most folks are probably not talking about the old games when they say they like wolfenstein and doom

                  I wouldn’t be so sure about that, what with the “It runs Doom” meme and the fact that most people on Lemmy seem to be old fucks like me who played them when they originally came out 😄

                • jorp@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Yeah like when we say RoboCop we think of the 2014 movie because it made a lot more at box office, and nobody thinks of the iconic and hugely influential original movie unless you say RoboCop (1987)

            • Aniki 🌱🌿
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Mate, Wolfenstein means something so far beyond a bunch of entirely forgettable reboots.

              • Lols [they/them]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                thats great

                the reboot is still probably most fans entry point to the franchise and frame of reference for discussing it, especially during a discussion about Bethesda

                that is not any kind of dig at the older games, the quality of them is entirely irrelevant to the point i was making

                you dont need to come to the defense of them, especially by venting about games that i also do not care about

      • jeffw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The reboots, they’ve owned the rights (or maybe ZeniMax technically?) of both for over a decade. I think id was bought out. So the Doom 2016 and Wolfenstein 2014 games and newer games are Bethesda published.

        Edit: ZeniMax bought id in 2009, so Doom and Doom Eternal, as well as Wolfenstein New Order, New Colossus and the two spinoffs (Youngblood, Old Blood) are Bethesda-published.

      • uis
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        They bought company that bought idSoftware

  • mrfriki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Played this on Game pass (the only way to play De Nuevo games in my opinion) Liked it a lot.

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Would you say the combat is repetitive?
      This game looks neat, I’ve been thinking about picking it up on a sale but not sure if I should

      • mrfriki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Combat is certanly not its strongest point, I wouldn’t call it repetitive, I found it fun at best and serviceable at worst. The best part of the game for me was traversing Tokyo by night, the powers your character has make it very enjoyable and the landscape is beautifully crafted. Also there are a lot of Japan urban legends and folklore mixed in there too. I’d say it’s a solid 20 hours experience. But it you are in it mostly for the combat I wouldn’t recommend it to you.

        • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh this sounds lovely.
          I’m not in it for the combat at all, I was afraid I’d have to suffer through it, but if it isn’t too bad, no problems for me. Thanks!

    • CharlesReed@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s how I got around to playing it recently too. I spent way more time than I should have wandering around just looking at stuff.

      • mrfriki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, some games like this are more about the mood, the settings and the exploration, even if it and empty alley or some random convenience store than the actual gameplay.

  • madsen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s great. Don’t get why they’re not announcing it, but whatever, I’m glad it’s gone.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Probably because announcing it would require sharing the reason for it and thus lead to questions about why they and others are still ruining other games with Denuvo…

  • WaybackGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Arguably the DRM is only worth it for the first month or so after launch. Once the sales start dropping it’s pointless. It’s annoying to the consumer either way though.