catculation@lemmy.zip to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 7 months agoGoogle lays off staff from Flutter, Dart and Python teams weeks before its developer conference | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1323arrow-down10cross-posted to: google@lemmy.world
arrow-up1323arrow-down1external-linkGoogle lays off staff from Flutter, Dart and Python teams weeks before its developer conference | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comcatculation@lemmy.zip to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square101fedilinkcross-posted to: google@lemmy.world
minus-squareŁumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·7 months agoThe kind that has bills to pay dumbass
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·7 months agono need for immature name-calling
minus-squareKedlylinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·edit-27 months agoHow is idiot not immature name calling, but dumbass is?
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·7 months agoBecause it was not directed at a specific person.
minus-squareKedlylinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·7 months agoSo if he phrased it as “The kind of person who would ask a question like this is a dumbass” not be immature name calling? Becuase that’d successfully not cross this weird line in the sand you’ve drawn
minus-squarerefalo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·7 months agoI think it would just be a subjective opinion at that point. And it’s not my line in the sand, but the actual definition: Name-calling is a form of argument in which insulting or demeaning labels are directed at an individual or group.
minus-squareKedlylinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·7 months agoSomeone who wouldnt realise that that definition applies to both insults isnt the greatest at reading comprehension
minus-squareŁumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·7 months agoShut up loser
The kind that has bills to pay dumbass
no need for immature name-calling
How is idiot not immature name calling, but dumbass is?
Because it was not directed at a specific person.
So if he phrased it as “The kind of person who would ask a question like this is a dumbass” not be immature name calling? Becuase that’d successfully not cross this weird line in the sand you’ve drawn
I think it would just be a subjective opinion at that point.
And it’s not my line in the sand, but the actual definition:
Someone who wouldnt realise that that definition applies to both insults isnt the greatest at reading comprehension
Shut up loser