• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Read the article. How exactly did they expect this to work on a “states’ grounds” premise when the hardware doesn’t exist in said state?

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not really pertinent where those records are stored (or the hardware.)

      Google operates in Michigan, and is subject to Michigan laws. This includes answering subpoenas for relevant documents

    • TransplantedSconie
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not understanding what you are saying.

      Twitter and Google gave them the messages in question after being presented with a warrant.