• TranscendentalEmpire
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Lol, you were the one who first dismissed evidence because it was 20 years old…

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      The point is you can reduce anything to its origin. That does not mean it’s still the same thing.

      • TranscendentalEmpire
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        The point is you can reduce anything to its origin.

        Okay, but how does the modern version of cathartic theory differ from what freud postulated?

        I agree you can’t reduce things based on its original alone , which is why I included a scientific source as evidence…

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t know, that’s why I have a therapist, I’m not educated in psychology. But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

          • TranscendentalEmpire
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

            I doubt that, so far your argument has been based on the anecdotal fallacy mixed with a bit of the appeal to authority fallacy.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Lmao. Says the guy who tried to use a study on aggression to address sexual urges.

              • TranscendentalEmpire
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Reading comprehension is still hard for you? My argument was about Cathartic theory, which includes several emotions including sexual urges… It is a theory from freud, of course it covers sexual urges.

                You and the other guy just have no idea what you’re talking about. How about providing any kind of source instead of talking out of your ass?