• Peruvian_Skies@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That still seems like semantics to me.

      I don’t know your background in physics. If you were to say “I feel that neutrinos make up most of what we call Black Matter”, I’d get the impression that you’re basing that statement on emotion, a gut feeling, aesthetics or something equally flimsy. If you said “I know that neutrinos…” I’d call bullshit because afaik there isn’t any conclusive evidence yet either way.

      If you said “I believe that neutrinos…” I’d assume that, despite the lack of conclusive evidence, according to your current level of understanding of the currently available evidence, you have reasoned that this is the strongest current hypothesis. Now, if you said “I have faith that neutrinos…”, I’d completely dismiss you as a crazy person.

      So I don’t think that we disagree about concepts here. We’re disagreeing about which words we use to represent those concepts.

    • teuast@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      i mean, sure, but that doesn’t mean that it would be inaccurate to say i “believe” the scientific consensus on most things, in a colloquial sense, anyway. the fact that the reason i think evolution is true is because of all the evidence for it and not just because forrest valkai said so doesn’t make the sentence “i believe in evolution” untrue.