Renationalisation

What happens now is still uncertain, but if the investors decide to walk away from the company it will face a crisis, as its current financial reserves will only enable it to continue functioning until May next year. The idea of renationalisation – for the government to step in and take ownership of the company to ensure a continued service, is being increasingly raised as a possibility by the capitalist press. The Tories are ideologically opposed to this; it would be a tacit admission that the claim Thatcher’s neoliberal privatisations would encourage more investment is false. Pressure would grow to nationalise other polluting water companies, the crumbling railways, the postal service or the profiteering energy companies as well.

  • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Despite the other letdowns, it seems Labour still plan to nationalise(ish) rail and halt the privatisation of primary and secondary schools (via academies). So at least there’s that.

    • squid@feddit.ukOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Its a step forward but labour is held to capitalist dogma which prevents real change and fast deployment. In a socialist society rail would unequivocally be nationalised with a much faster speed as well as schools no need for academies.

        • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Because they’re a bunch of semi gelatinous talentless middle managers who can’t take a shit without consulting a focus group to get feedback on the optics.