• Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Could a non-human vanguard be possible for a broader scope of governance? I don’t trust humanity all that much when it come to dictation.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, that is just another class of ownership. Whoever maintains the AI would be the ruling class. Or if we’re talking AGI, there’s little reason humanity should trust what humans build over what humans do.

    • squid_slime
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      AI could do it but this is fantasy, current ai would have everyone eating glue pizza lol.

        • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It already was, compare project cybersyn to the Walmarts and amazons we have now.

          Software is not a person and will serve the people in control of it.

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sorry, but I don’t trust humanity. How do I know this isn’t just some ploy to further enslave workers?