• Rooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Oh no who would have guessed that screenshoting and saving them unencrypted in an unprotected area in where confidential screenshots with passwords can be grabbed by any script kiddie.

    • Albbi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      17 days ago

      Even if we ignore the security issues (and we shouldn’t) why the hell would I want my computer taking screenshots, writing that to disk and running OCR on the image, writing results to a database and creating correlations EVERY FEW SECONDS! That’s a huge amount of bloat. I want my computer to be quick and responsive.

    • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s not like people deserve any sense of privacy, their passwords should be public knowledge.

      If you have done nothing wrong, you shouldn’t have anything to hide (said every authoritarian asshat ever)

    • Railcar8095
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      Correction: they are encrypted. Not well, but cut them some slack, it’s a small startup.

      • Rooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 days ago

        No they arent. They are obfuscated at best. The images are just saved without .jpg extension, and slapping one behind is enough

        • Railcar8095
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          It’s encrypted, but at the same level as everything else the user has access to. So, if your computer is stolen and they can’t log in, they can’t access it.

          Basically, encrypted, just like any other user file.

          • Rooki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            I think you forgot to mention if the hard drive is encrypted than your statement is true ( in the case for example bitlocker…) but if thats not the case then anyone can just force permissions for that drive and read and write anything.

            Bitlokcer would be default active on new windows 11 devices if they all had tpm 2.0 chips ( most of the windows 10 users dont have that featzre ) so bitlocker is out of that case.

            • Railcar8095
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 days ago

              The drive is encrypted on W11, if you tamper with the install to allow non TPM requirement then I don’t think you can blame anybody if there are consequences. You can install a random exe from the internet, give it admin rights too, that’s also on you.

              This is a shit show already, no need to make things up to make it worse really.

              • Rooki@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 days ago

                Still tpm 2.0 should never be required in the first place. But yeah windows is already a shitshow

    • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      Please, give them some credit where it’s due and don’t be so hard on them. You’d have to be technically sound and computer experts to have that kind of foresight!