Two years ago, few would have thought Peter Dutton would go to the next election without a 2030 climate target. So what’s changed?

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 days ago

    Two years ago, few would have thought Peter Dutton would go to the next election without a 2030 climate target.

    Who the fuck were they asking? It’s bloody obvious to me. He’s the hard right of the right-wing party. He’s never given a shit about climate, why would anyone think that would change?

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 days ago

        Genuinely, I don’t think anyone has any expectations he will. I think the Liberal Party installed him to be an effective attack dog in opposition, with the plan of replacing him before the 2028 election, because they’ve already written off 2025.

  • joelfromaus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 days ago

    He reminds voters of Anthony Albanese’s promised $275 reduction in power bills, which is yet to be delivered: “How much higher will your electricity prices go under this prime minister?”

    I don’t remember prices ever being cheaper under the coalition and I doubt spending billions on nuclear power would bring them down. Not to mention those plants would probably get on-sold to one of Duttons mates for pennies and then rape the energy market for profits.

    All this to say: I’m glad I invested in home solar years ago and I’m glad I could finally afford a home battery. I’m just sorry for people who cannot afford or who are unable to do so.

  • TinyBreak@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 days ago

    dude shot himself in the foot, but the F’ed thing is that regional boomers dont give a shit and will still vote for him anyway. Our only hope now is Harry and Hermione pull the finger out and finish the job.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The Coalition opposed tougher penalties for big polluters under the strengthened Safeguards Mechanism, underwriting large-scale renewable projects via the new Capacity Investment Scheme, and the adoption of Australia’s first Vehicle Emissions Standard.

    One of the Coalition’s main selling points for nuclear is that it allows the heavy lifting on emissions reduction to be left until much closer to 2050, when the plants finally come online.

    But as with Dutton’s recent pledge to cut net overseas migration, made during a radio interview, most colleagues quickly fell into line.

    While centrist parties won a majority in the European Parliament elections on the weekend, gains by far-right candidates and heavy losses for the Greens have thrown into doubt Europe’s climate ambitions.

    He reminds voters of Anthony Albanese’s promised $275 reduction in power bills, which is yet to be delivered: “How much higher will your electricity prices go under this prime minister?”

    In a devastating piece for Quarterly Essay, Gergis warns if emissions continue at the current rate, the lower limit set in the Paris Agreement to prevent temperatures rising by more than 1.5 degrees Celsius “could be breached as soon as 2028”.


    The original article contains 1,210 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 84%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!