• Aqarius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    …This, honestly, sounds like less of a trolley problem and more of a prisoners dilemma. As in, if everyone enough people defect, you get track 2, if enough people don’t defect, you get track 3, and track 1 is if it’s in between.

    Of course, the problem, then, is that it would imply the people aiming for track 2 will defect, people aiming for track 3 won’t, and people aiming for track 1 would try to convince people not to defect, while defecting themselves.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Quiet you! If you say anything else we’ll get flooded with the trolley/prisoner fusion experiment spam from reddit!

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I mean tbf given the original intent of the creator any use of the experiment aside from pointing and laughing at the stupid idiots who the two decisions represent is a misuse

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’re not wrong. Especially with the fact that copious capital goes into political campaigning from all sides; it’s kind of like a prisoner’s dilemma where the prisoners can communicate—for a price but both tracks 1 and 2 are well funded by corporate interest while 3 is just kind of left to fend for itself.