Obviously this won’t work for all sports, but things like football, track, soccer, it would allow for de-gendered team, even allowing athletes with the skills but not the genetically-endowed physical attributes to have a place to play.

Note: I know very little about sports and being on a sports team, so please point out anything that doesn’t make sense.

  • kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    You think that accounts for the differences? 42 of 2500 grandmasters are women because all the women are scared and intimidated of the men?

    Maybe this plays some small effect but I doubt it’s statistically significant enough in this context

    Like you said, it happens to men playing higher rated men. In order to go up in ranking, you need to play and beat progressively higher rated opponents.

    By the very nature of being a high level player, that player would have had to go through that.

    • JovialMicrobial
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      It’s a phenomenon that’s been observed across multiple sports, not just between men and women chess players. It’s particularly poignant in men vs women’s chess… because of people repeatedly telling women they are inherently worse than men. Like you are doing right now.

      There’s been multiple studies on this. So yes, I side with the data that stereotype threat phenomenon has a significant impact on women’s performance in chess against men.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Show me. Link me a couple.

        I don’t think this effect can account for more than a small fraction of the difference. Let’s look at the research. I couldn’t find anything from a quick search but maybe I’m using wrong terms.

      • LordGimp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        The bigger difference imo is the brain development due to hormones in the womb. Old TLC program had a whole section on this suggesting it’s why STEM fields are generally male dominated. Turns out hormones that determine biological gender also very much effect the development of the brain, and the male chemicals tend to develop the spatial reasoning part of the brain faster/more thoroughly than those who get don’t get the male chemicals and stay female. This average higher spatial reasoning capacity creates an advantage in tasks or objectives where complex visualizations are necessary, like visualizing chess moves in your head.

        It’s not some massive, overwhelming difference, but it’s enough to tilt the table. Play out that average enough and you have 42 women out of 2500 chess grandmasters

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          TLC is name I have not heard on a long time. Did they really use the term “biological gender”?

          • LordGimp
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 days ago

            Bro they had a lot of wild shit back in the day. I remember that term specifically because they couldn’t use the word “sex” on the program and had to bend over backwards using every other possible phrase.