Many of the women who responded to an online callout or spoke to the Guardian expressed frustration with politics that had failed to address poverty, inequality, healthcare for women and children in particular, the climate and Brexit, and voiced acute fears for their and their families’ future: mothers of children with SEN (special educational needs) or mental health issues, mothers unable to afford childcare, or with adult children unable to buy homes, unpaid carers, women feeling exploited in low-paid jobs with no prospects of progression, and women with disabilities fearing harsher welfare conditions in future.
Scores also said they were concerned about rising extremism and political polarisation, misogyny, violence against women and girls, antisemitism and Islamophobia.
About a fifth of respondents said they had either decided to spoil their ballot paper or were considering doing so, among them Sharon, a 60-year-old social worker and “lifelong Labour voter” from London who does not own her own home and has no savings. Her two adult children are unemployed, despite having gone to university, each owing about £40,000 as a result. Private rental housing was “beyond their means”, she said.
…
Politicians, she said, had repeatedly failed to deliver on promises, such as building more houses, improving the NHS, or reducing knife crime.
“However, the final straw for me is the issue of women’s rights,” she added.
Sharon was one of hundreds of women who shared that sex-based rights for women and girls was a main political concern of theirs this election.
Women from across the country, dozens of them economically disadvantaged or with disabilities, said they would abandon Labour, the Lib Dems or the Greens over this issue and vote either Conservative, Reform or spoil their ballot – particularly women from marginal areas Labour is hoping to gain, such as Lincoln, Darlington, Derbyshire, Warrington North and Truro and Falmouth.
Various said they felt “politically homeless” because of this issue, with Starmer having repeatedly referred to the debate over trans rights as “divisive and toxic” culture wars.
Nope, transphobes do as a matter of fact need punching in the face just as much as the actual goddamned Nazis they align themselves with for the sake of hating trans people for existing.
Just because a Nazi is a woman doesn’t mean she deserves to hang any less.
FARTs deserve to live in fear, because their backwards “I failed bio 101” beliefs impose that fear on innocent random folks every day.
Threatening physical violence makes it seem like you’ve lost the argument
That presumes the other side is worthy of arguing with.
We don’t reason with rabid dogs. We put them down.
You can’t claim the moral high ground while using that kind of rhetoric. It’s the kind of thing a right wing nutter would say about some given group they disagree with.
Absolutely. This is definitely not a completely unhinged take.
You see this trick you’re trying where you say actually very true things but sarcastically doesn’t actually make them less true, you just look more like a douche canoe.
When someone is unhinged as you, it’s best not to waste time engaging with any common sense.