I’m going to say what everyone is thinking but too afraid to admit: Battle Royale games are the epitome of lazy game design.

They rely on the same tired formula and add nothing new to the gaming landscape. These games are just cash grabs, feeding off the hype, and they’ll be forgotten in a few years.

We need real innovation in gaming, not just a hundred-player deathmatch with a shrinking map. Change my mind.

  • Kevin@hilariouschaos.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Dropping 100 players into a map and making them fight isn’t innovative. It’s the lowest common denominator of game design.

    • Arthur @hilariouschaos.comM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      You sound like someone who can’t handle the competition. It’s a lot harder to win against real players than scripted NPCs.

      • Kevin@hilariouschaos.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Maybe I just prefer games that respect my time and intelligence. Battle Royales are designed to keep you playing and spending money, not to challenge or entertain you meaningfully.

        • Arthur @hilariouschaos.comM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Or maybe you just can’t keep up with the evolving gaming landscape. Battle Royales are here to stay, whether you like it or not.

          • Kevin@hilariouschaos.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            We’ll see about that. I’m betting on them fading into obscurity like every other overhyped trend. Real gamers know what’s up.