However I find myself being disagreed with quite often, mostly for not advocating or cheering violence, “by any means possible” change, or revolutionary tactics. It would seem that I’m not viewed as authentically holding my view unless I advocate extreme, violent, or radical action to accomplish it.

Those seem like two different things to me.

Edit: TO COMMUNISTS, ANARCHISTS, OR ANYONE ELSE CALLING FOR THE OVERTHROW OF SOCIETY

THIS OBVIOUSLY ISN’T MEANT FOR YOU.

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Here’s a fun exercise: Ask queermunist what they think of some left wing issue that isn’t something that would be a good talking point for an outside adversary of the left to use to destabilize it, or make it lose.

    They’re very vocal about wanting the left to use violence. They’re very vocal about wanting people not to vote for Biden. Foreign policy in Central and South America? Justice for farm workers? Prison reform? Fuck all that shit, let’s talk about some guns.

    Idk, now that I have given the game away they may have a different reaction. 🙂 But that was my experience when I asked about it, and I made from that an inference about them and some other parts of the Lemmy left that may form a good potential answer to the question you were asking.

    • MarciaLynnDorsett@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      how about you don’t engage in bad faith red herrings? instead, you could address the points other people raise in their comments.

      this is some smug, manipulative bullshit.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        This was literally a conversation I had with queermunist (I am almost sure; it was a while ago but I am fairly confident that was the other participant when I had the exchange). I’m just filling OP in on the content and recommending they try to experiment themselves, because I think it’s an extremely relevant contribution to OP’s understanding of the answer to their question.

        smug

        Dude I am King Smug; it is 100% fair

        manipulative bullshit

        Not really

        • MarciaLynnDorsett@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          it is manipulative. it is designed to distract from the subject at hand and imply that the person being asked is acting in bad faith if they don’t chase your red herring.

          • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah that was how the person reacted when I asked it that other time, too. Like HOW DARE YOU ASK ME ABOUT MY BELIEFS, THAT IS A DIRTY TRICK

            I found it very notable, too, that perfectly normal reaction. Not like “why is Central America relevant to this lol” but “how dare you”