I remember before 4-5 years, most movies was in the range of 80-100 mins, this days for reason or another it’s in the range of 100-x<200 mins.

I hate fillers, fighting scenes, sex scenes, repetitive scenes, old comedy styles and unnecessary talk scenes, matter of fact I started realising that if the trend for longer movies continues, we will need to have a sponserblock like add-on/ database api to trim the movie time(remove the unnecessary scenes) to a reasonable time to have more fun.

Why is that happening and is it a continuing trend(meaning that 2025 will have even longer movies)?

  • ArkhamNightshift@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think that it’s a few factors. Some movies that were longer started to be accepted, like the summer blockbusters creeping longer and longer and people not complaining much about the length. Then streaming picking up more and more, and with habits of binging it became apparent people were happy to sit for longer and longer times watching content (shows, documentaries, movies) and then with COVID and people looking for things to occupy their time longer content was welcomed more.

    Though with your list of things you don’t like in films I’m not sure you really like films at all? Talking scenes are usually important for dialogue exposition, reflecting the characters mindsets etc, but why do you hate fight scenes and comedy scenes? What kind of movies do you like?

    • ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I think you did not get me when I listed the things I don’t like.

      Here is a explanation:

      Unnecessary Talking Scenes: what I meant by that is when producers insert a long scenes of group talking about a topic that will not make you know the personality of the speaker or give you a clue about what is going to happen in the future in the movie.

      Fight Scenes: they simply waste time without being realistic, I had seen only 1 interesting fight scene in the past 3 years that I was actually interested in watching due to being unpredictable (it was unrealistic but interesting).

      Old Comedy Scenes: a lot of movies try to insert a joke that had been said 100 times in the last year alone and I kind of started to predict how they end just based on pattern recognition, I like modern comedy scenes.

      I have a lot of good movies I liked actually:

      • Flypaper:87 Mins.
      • Nobody: 92 Mins(I liked some fight scenes in it).
      • This is the End: 106 mins.
      • Hangover movies.
      • Some superhero movies (Dr. Strange, avengers, iron man, venom and hulk)

      You got my general vibe here.

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    In my experience most movies still clock in around 90 minutes to 2 hours. Yes, there are a lot more movies that hit the 2.5 to 3 hour mark now, but that’s certainly not the norm. The simple answer as to why they keep making them that long is that people keep watching them. If everyone suddenly decided they weren’t willing to sit through a 3 hour movie anymore, then studios would stop making them.

    From your list of things you find unacceptable in films though it seems almost like you just don’t like movies in general, or only very specific types of movies anyway. There are tons of great shows out now that range anywhere from 15 minutes to an hour per episode, maybe you would enjoy those more?

  • pelotron@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The studios paid a lot of money for all that CGI so they damn sure are going to use all of it.

  • golli
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I think it definitely has something to do with monetary factors.

    Rising ticket prices mean that the audience expects a cinematic event for their money. Like if you are spending as much as $100 as a group for tickets and snacks/drinks, would you be satisfied with a short 90min film or would you rather have a spectacle like avatar?

    And from the studio side there are all the factors that also lead to the death of the mid-budget movies. You are already spending a ton of money on marketing and for the general audience it’s probably a “winner takes all” scenario. The mid-budget movie with its similar sized marketing campaign can’t compete with something like a Deadpool 3. And if you are spending big on marketing you might as well spend more to make sure you hit. And stuff like good CGI that is expected nowadays is also not cheap

    Additionally larger overall budget+returns give you growth. the amount of days in a year is fixed, so there is only so many release windows that make sense without movies cannibalizing each others returns. Even if you can only dream of the margins of some low budget horror movies.

    Not a horror fan myself, so I actually don’t know if that’s the case, but I could imagine that niche genres that don’t need that much marketing campaign (and don’t have a potential audience large to support a larger one) will still have shorter run times.

  • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    My favorite part of movies is when characters can just exist as themselves.

    So more unnecessary talk scenes for me please!