• FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Some of the other reading I’ve done implys its the salt, sugar, and fats. These were historically much more rare in our diets so our bodies encouraged us to eat them. Now big food processors are using it to sell more junk foods.

    I remember reading a similar study a while back that made claims eating processed foods from a young age trains your taste buds to crave them more in adulthood.

    • anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Right? The headline makes it sound like they’re hunting for the mythical ”cravinol", but it’s literally calorie density.

      I recently had some homemade ice cream and I guarantee that was worse for me than the Ben and Jerrys dairy free I normally get.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It’s a lot more than calorie density… it’s the distribution of fats, sugars, and salts. Salt doesn’t provide effectively any calories, but it’s still basically the mythical “cravinol.”

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Would love to see a strong consumer protection administration straight up demand the proprietary research that pioneered this stuff and hold executives accountable.

  • BearOfaTime
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    We need a study to understand the chemistry/psychology research the “food” manufacturers use to make the processed crap attractive to us?

    Really?