• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t get me wrong, I like Kirschner, I watch his channel, and he’s got a ton of experience and insight.

    However, he’s very much on the side of being “overly hopeful” around the topic of Trump’s legal woes, kind of to the point of not always being completely objective. Harry Litman and Andrew Weissman are more objective, and I would love to know either of their opinions on this.

    • btaf45@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You may be right. I am less familiar with Kirschner than Weissman. I would like to hear Weissman’s opinion too.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If they can prove Trump personally directed the fake elector scheme and it wasn’t just Eastman or Giuliani or Chesebro or somebody, then yes, he absolutely should be indicted, and not just in Arizona, but all the fake elector states.

    Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.

    TBH, it all looked too clean and organized for anyone other than a lawyer to have pulled it off. I’m betting on Eastman or Chesebro. Giuliani couldn’t even identify the Four Seasons.

  • finley
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    The funny thing is that the grand jury was all like “we want to indict Trump!” but the prosecutor was like “no no no, we’re not ready yet!“ So they have to wait to indict him until they get some other ppl to flip, lol.