Democratic nominee to draw contrast with Trump on tax and tariffs when she lays out details on Friday, aides say

Kamala Harris will announce plans to tackle high grocery costs by targeting corporations in the food and grocery industry, as she previews her economic agenda ahead of the November election.

She will also tackle prescription drug and housing costs, drawing a contrast with Trump on tariffs and taxes, according to a Harris campaign statement.

Harris is expected to lay out some details of her economic plan in a speech in North Carolina on Friday.

“Same values, different vision,” said one aide, describing how Harris’s economic agenda will compare with that of Joe Biden, who stepped aside as the Democratic presidential candidate last month.

  • treefrog
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m for preventing monopolies and breaking them up.

    My point wasn’t that that’s a bad thing. But that this is more of an oligopoly situation rather than a monopoly.

    My town has Walmart, Kroger, Target, and a Co-OP within five minutes of my house. They’re all gouging prices and have been since the pandemic.

    This isn’t a situation where breaking up monopolies is the cure. Though preventing the Kroger/Albertsons merger will certainly keep things from getting worse.

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      You listed three megacorps and a co-op as your local food suppliers. Those three megacorps set the market prices. If they were broken into the 50 smaller companies that they originally consumed or destroyed over the years, there could be real competition again, driving prices lower. It may be hard to imagine several smaller stores instead of just a few huge ones, but that was how things used to be many years ago. As a kid, I worked at a few of them that are now long extinct, having been consumed or destroyed by the megacorps.

      It was a different landscape, where grocery stores aggressively competed on price with weekly and daily specials that were genuinely trying to undercut competitors. It was real. I saw it with my own eyes. Families would drive two blocks further down the street to a competitor because something was a tiny bit cheaper there that week. This sounds bizarre and foreign now because competition does not exist anymore. What exists now are megacorps.

      The Kamala campaign is correct. The more that is done to create a competitive landscape, the lower prices will become. Can they really be broken up? Yes. Will they be broken up? I guess that depends on how much lobby money the megacorps are willing to spend.

      • treefrog
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes, but the term is oligopoly. And it requires different tactics than breaking up monopolies because they’re not a monopoly.

        I made a longer post explaining here. Sorry if I’m coming off as pedantic but I find the distinction in this instance between oligopoly and monopoly important.

        https://lemm.ee/post/39694050/14065675

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Government can help a lot of the time, was my only aside there. But yes oligopoly busting would also be helpful.