• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Against self-proclaimed leftists who simp for brutal authoritarian states because the state flies a red flag and says “America bad”.

    • EABOD25
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s pretty specific. Only for “self-proclaimed leftists who simp for brutal authoritarian states”?

        • EABOD25
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          3 months ago

          That doesn’t answer my question

            • EABOD25
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              You comment history tells me that talking with you will just give me a headache

          • Shihali@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You said “That’s pretty specific” and gave a definition of “tankie”. The reply “Tankie is a pretty specific term” affirms what you said, and because that’s the end of the reply implicitly affirms your definition of “tankie”. So it does answer your question with “yes”.

            I don’t have the skillset to teach conversational implicatures and inference in English, even my own dialect. So I can’t help with all problems like this.

            In practice, it’s even more specific, because “tankie” wouldn’t cover a self-proclaimed leftist who claims that Dr. Francia’s dictatorship is a model all states should aspire to. “Tankie” means “self-proclaimed leftist who simps for self-proclaimed Leninist brutal authoritarian states”.