In the legal sense and clarity of AI scrutiny it’s important what we pin on the movement of “Ai” and what is on a pervert taking hours on a photo editing software. The explicit imagery is disgusting either way, but a headline screaming “Ai images led this famous actress to delete Twitter in disgust and shame” vs “some pervert created photoshopped images of Ortega that led her to delete Twitter” changes the perspective of where our outrage is. Don’t mistake it, image generation via prompts should 100% be controlled, but using this event to promote outrage towards that with misleading headlines isn’t the way.
In the legal sense and clarity of AI scrutiny it’s important what we pin on the movement of “Ai” and what is on a pervert taking hours on a photo editing software. The explicit imagery is disgusting either way, but a headline screaming “Ai images led this famous actress to delete Twitter in disgust and shame” vs “some pervert created photoshopped images of Ortega that led her to delete Twitter” changes the perspective of where our outrage is. Don’t mistake it, image generation via prompts should 100% be controlled, but using this event to promote outrage towards that with misleading headlines isn’t the way.
Cool. Another achualy idiot to block. Thanks.
Only the highest class of narcissistic loser announces they’re blocking someone online.
Do you really think anyone else gives a shit? lol
Do you really think the person you’re replying to cares about your opinion? Or is your reply merely performative?
That person has defended child porn recently.
Obviously you care