The actress said it was “terrifying” to have to see “dirty edited content of me as a child.”

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    if i have to keep reading more bullshit about twitter every goddamn day, then everyone also has to read me repeat myself:

    DELETE TWITTER ALREADY

    • squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, it’s way overdue to delete Twitter, but I also know far too many people who cling to it, providing one specious justification or another. I really don’t know what still needs to happen in order for left-ish/progressive/queer/… people to finally get off of Twitter.

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      To make it worse, my kids school uses twitter. Both the school and the principal.

      I get why they created the account in the first place, I just wish they would just move on, or at least add others (mastodon, bluesky, I don’t even care right now) so that twitter can just achieve its full death rattle already.

        • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          For announcements we get emails too, that’s always a link to a PDF sort of thing, but its always a good bit behind.

          There was an incident where there were generic threats to the high school, and the elementary school got locked down too. The email was literally hours after the twitter post for that, which is frustrating.

    • nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      She’s a celebrity, she probably felt like it was important for her job. And this story isn’t about Twitter, it’s about AI CP and how horribly creepy and harmful it is.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        well she deleted it, so i wasn’t addressing her specifically, but everyone who hasn’t deleted it.

        also, true, AI impersonation is a huge problem, but that doesn’t mean the story isn’t also about twitter and how shitty it is

        lastly, “child porn” is the wrong term. it’s child sexual abuse material, CSAM. porn is consensual, legal, and highly regulated. sexual abuse is none of those things

    • Ellia Plissken
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      but it’s the only place I can follow sex workers where they can post their titties for free. other than r*ddit

  • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ironically I only still have a twitter because I used it to log into tiktok and that seemed the best way to keep actual details from them. (twitter has none to give)

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    There wasn’t AI image generation when she was a teen, it was regular photoshop.

    • Zikeji@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m guessing the photos she’s referencing weren’t edited back when she was still a teen, and that someone recently took the older photos and ran them through AI.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        It says she received them when she was 14, 7 years ago. Not that it isn’t a problem and that problem is definitely worse because of AI, it just to show that this has been happening a long time and that trying to blame it on AI when it happened 7 years ago is bad journalism.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t see them saying it was okay. Seems pretty obvious they’re just correcting the “AI” part of it, since it is in fact inaccurate (she received the images she’s talking about 7 years ago).

        • TachyonTele
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You seriously think there were no other incidents since seven years ago? Lol

          People like you and the other two commenters are part of the reason the Internet is horrible. Fuck off with your dumb ass “corrections”.

      • Aermis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        In the legal sense and clarity of AI scrutiny it’s important what we pin on the movement of “Ai” and what is on a pervert taking hours on a photo editing software. The explicit imagery is disgusting either way, but a headline screaming “Ai images led this famous actress to delete Twitter in disgust and shame” vs “some pervert created photoshopped images of Ortega that led her to delete Twitter” changes the perspective of where our outrage is. Don’t mistake it, image generation via prompts should 100% be controlled, but using this event to promote outrage towards that with misleading headlines isn’t the way.

        • TachyonTele
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Cool. Another achualy idiot to block. Thanks.

          • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Only the highest class of narcissistic loser announces they’re blocking someone online.

            Do you really think anyone else gives a shit? lol

            • don
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Do you really think the person you’re replying to cares about your opinion? Or is your reply merely performative?

              • TachyonTele
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                That person has defended child porn recently.

                “Child porn” requires a child–pixels on a screen depicting a person that does not actually exist is not a child.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah but if you put AI in the title anyways it gets more clicks and the AI stuff is also a problem so it all balances out ehhhhh