• rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 days ago

    Dunno, my cousins’ dad was a 17yo soldier. One can say it was a better time cause he was on the winning side, and now that has become the losing side.

    Mass surveillance was more old-school, but governments were still pretty harsh.

    They had Trump. He just was younger, Democrat and apparently popular.

    They had AI in your spam mail.

    Climate collapse … again, where half my family is from, war broke logistics in the 90s, so to have heat at winter people would cut down trees. A lot of forest lost. But one can say it was a better time because “the world” cared more about civilians suffering than about forests. I suspect now climate activists would act differently.

    • CazzoneArrapante
      link
      fedilink
      Italiano
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      Again, no climate crisis + no mass surveillance + cheaper housing = do not give a shit. Were it for me, 70s, 80s and 90s on a loop forever. You lose something from the loop? Tough shit, your problem, not mine.

        • CazzoneArrapante
          link
          fedilink
          Italiano
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          16 days ago

          Yuuup. Sorry, whenever I complained about climate change on Reddit I was just shrugged with “oh well, too late, you’ll die”, “muh China/India/feedback loops”, “just move North”. So, they give me back the climate, the economy and the freedom of the 80s and then I’ll care again.

            • CazzoneArrapante
              link
              fedilink
              Italiano
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              15 days ago

              Fair answer. My point is that my frustration with the modern world is absolute and shit like this doesn’t help, and I see whatever problems there might have been back then as irrelevant in comparison.