• True@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Why not categorize both as theft and give more power to the workers?

          • Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            17 days ago

            That lies on the the other side of the libertarian spectrum, the anti-capitalist one, which you can call anarchy to avoid confusion. Does not really match your meme that keeps the capitalist aspect of income as a key concept. Anarchy and (capitalist) libertarianism are really incompatible, since one fights against capital and the other fights for it. In french we distinguish those two philosophies with two words, libertaire (anarchist) and libertarien (libertarian). Since it does not exist in English, i strongly recommend you use Anarchism or social Libertarianism when you want to mean anti-capitalist Libertarianism, it helps avoid the confusion.

      • aaa999@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        17 days ago

        I do except I theoretically get to vote on what happens to taxes so that’s somewhat different than a robbery where you don’t get to do that

      • Todd Bonzalez
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        17 days ago

        Because without the state, capitalism will be completely in control, that’s why.