• ReadFanon [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Before you stands the merchant. He has 7 fingers on one hand and 6 on the other. Arranged haphazardly on his stall are 5 iterations of the same sword, each being less functional and more poorly designed than the last.

    "Would you care to buy one of my daggers?" he asks you.

    "These are swords," you say.

    I’m sorry. Upon further inspection it seems that these are swords. I apologise for any factual errors, I strive for accuracy in my statements however due to problems with interpreting questions and generating responses occasionally I may make statements that are inaccurate. I appreciate your patience.

    But I didn’t ask you a question.

    You’re right. I apologise for the misunderstanding. Occasionally errors will be made due to issues with generating responses but I strive to be as accurate as possible. I appreciate your patience.

    You walk away from the merchant feeling irritated and unsatisfied as you shake your head in disgust.

  • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    6 days ago

    What exactly is he suggesting using AI for? A busy, thankless, unpaid, DM using AI to flesh out the details of a campaign is a good use of ai. But what is he - the CEO of Hasbro - going to do with AI?

    • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      6 days ago

      WotC desperately wants to get customers comfortable with paying for AI generated images. They could effectively gut the expensive art departments. A major use for AI would be for Hasbro’s card games. They already pay like shit. If the option to make “art” for nothing becomes available, they’ll do it.

      • Smeagolicious [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        6 days ago

        Gut the art departments, arguably some of what very little value actually remains in WotC outside of their clawing corporate avarice. Great idea great idea

      • Roonerino [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah it’s pretty good for “close enough” stuff but every stupid image I could make wastes so much energy that I prefer to just do an image search and steal some real human-made images. From an art theft perspective it may as well be the same thing anyway, and if it’s just for a silly game between me and my pals who gives a shit.

        • SnowySkyes [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          6 days ago

          That’s more or less how I feel nowadays. When I really need an NPC image, I just find a deviantArt image or something now. But I honestly eschew images entirely now and just go for proper descriptions so people can create them in their mind’s eye.

        • Moonguide@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 days ago

          Not even close enough if you have a mind for detail. I’m running a weird campaign rn (cyberpunk red ported to 5e) and I really want to nail the visual vibe of things, somewhere close to Jean Giraud. AI can’t do perspective for tokens to save its skin, and cannot keep a style consistent no matter how you try.

          Ended up having my players do their characters on heroforge, sending me a screenshot, and then me tracing over it and putting my spin on it. More work for me, but I just can’t get what I want from AI.

    • GVAGUY3 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Problem is I’m playing a changing. I can’t get it to work for shit. It only works for the core ancestries / races

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 days ago

    All your CEO tier executive “mates” are using it because they’re all bazinga brains trying to support it because they see it as a way to make more money.

    They’re not using it organically because it’s actually good. Their incentive to use it is coming from the earning potential they see in it if they can convince audiences to adopt it.

  • Rose Thorne(She/Her)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ah, yes, just what I want, a group of 8 rats my level 1 party is struggling to take down suddenly get hallucinated into a Balrog and Terrasque.

    I can understand for maybe punching something up a little, using it to help generate some NPCs or something like that, but anything more than that is just a no from me.

      • Rose Thorne(She/Her)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        6 days ago

        I mean, I take plenty of fun with it, but sometimes you’re just blanking and looking for some inspiration besides “yet another merchant”.

        Using an A.I to generate a jumping off platform shouldn’t be completely disregarded. Have it spit out a couple descriptors, go from there.

        • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          The bigger problem with moving people over to a dependency on AI is you’re reducing creativity within the community. In the longterm you’re reducing people’s creative ability level and creating a dependency on the tool.

          I would not be surprised if this has other adverse effects too. For example one of the major driving forces within Tabletop Games for community interaction between players is DMs speaking to other DMs to share ideas, creative ability, talent, and improve themselves as DMs. It’s a skillset that is communally spread, learned and ideas bounced around between people. Even in this thread there’s a DM taking an idea from another DM.

          You offload this to AI and you are actively killing reasons for humans to interact with each other. Now this MIGHT form a different kind of community, if you’re lucky. There are still artists who create real art who communicate with each other in communities and help each other grow - and then there are bazinga AI communities who all share with each other how to bazinga the AI into hallucinating the end result images that they want. That’s two different kinds of community, so maybe that will be how it goes for something like this. The question is whether you actually want that or not though.

          • Rose Thorne(She/Her)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            6 days ago

            I guess for me, I just see an A.I stepping in for “Lemme pull up a table and break out a d100, wherever I land is where I start writing from”. I’m not saying to let it control, or even go for the detail.

            Use it as an accessory, not a replacement.

        • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 days ago

          Do you need to materially wear out a $5000 GPU for that? I’m pretty sure there have been books full of “roll some D20s for random encounters/scenes/etc” for years.