The US presidential election remains on a knife-edge 45 days before voters go to the polls, despite Kamala Harris enjoying one of her most encouraging spells of opinion polling since becoming the Democrats’ nominee nearly two months ago.

During yet another momentous week that began with a suspected second assassination attempt against Donald Trump, the latest Guardian 10-day polling averages survey shows Harris increasing her lead to 2.6 points, 48.5% to 45.9%.

While still within error margins, that is an improvement of the 0.9% edge Harris held last week and a significant shift from the statistical dead heat of a fortnight ago before the candidates held their only scheduled televised debate in Philadelphia on 10 September.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    But how do you even make an educated guess anymore? So few people answer their phone now that there’s no way you’ll get any idea.

    • catloaf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      They use other survey methods. Go read any methodology and it will describe how they collected their data.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        But that would require learning stuff instead of spouting off whatever negative shit feels good

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They just keep going down the list until they have enough respondents to use for the data.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t think there is a list of phone numbers out there that can give you anything close to an educated guess for people under 30. They don’t even like to talk on the phone. They’d rather be texted.

        • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Polling companies have a standard number of people they need that will cover their demographic requirements (ie: age, income, location). They keep going down their list of phone numbers until those requirements are fulfilled.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            But again, how can they accurately get that in terms of opinion when so few people under 30 are willing to answer their phones? It doesn’t matter what your demographics are when you’re still restricted to the small number of people under 30 that are willing to answer their phones, making them outliers to begin with.

            • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Their lists are millions of names long. It takes them a lot longer than it did 30 years ago, but they slog away at it until they get enough.

              • catloaf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s faster. They use more methods than just calling, but the calls can be automated and the data entry digitized. (I know there are restrictions on robodialing, but I’m sure surveys have an exemption or approval process.)