• walden@sub.wetshaving.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    21 hours ago

    This is a good idea, and hopefully will help people get a leg up. Better credit scores can save you money by opening up lower interest rates.

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This is only for tenants obligated to pay on a lease, not for month to month tenants with a rental agreement but no lease- also it’s for apartment buildings with 16 units minimum.

      • bobs_monkey
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Probably to not burden smaller landlords with excess costs for reporting and infrastructure if I had to guess

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The only thing I would change is that the landlord is allowed to ONLY charge their exact cost. But otherwise yeah this is a good idea (having your rental payments show or affect your credit score).

        • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Monthly cost or $10, whichever is less, is better. It means the landlord is incentivized to keep costs down. Even if it costs the landlord $50, they can only charge the tenant $10. If it costs them $5, they can only charge the tenant $5. It’s a ceiling on the cost.

          • andrewta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Maybe I’m misunderstanding.

            This is a cost to have your rent showing up on the credit report, correct?

            How would the landlord have any control over what they charge?

            • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I assume the landlord uses a service to share rent with the credit report agencies. The landlord can shop around for a cheaper service, or use their cousin who charges $50/tenant but gives the landlord a kickback.

              • andrewta@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                I think assumptions in this case is a bad idea.

                If the landlord has a realistic way to control the price then that’s one thing but I would want to see how they control that price. Or if they even have any say in it. If the landlord has no say then the landlord should charge exactly their cost.

  • SoylentBlake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If buying a house is out of reach for people, what the fuck is the point of credit?

    Private equity crippling the credit industry. 🙊