kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoReddit is making sitewide protests basically impossiblewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square446fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down122cross-posted to: redditwasfun@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonereddit@lemmy.worldquarks@startrek.website
arrow-up11.25Karrow-down1external-linkReddit is making sitewide protests basically impossiblewww.theverge.comkingthrillgore@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square446fedilinkcross-posted to: redditwasfun@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonereddit@lemmy.worldquarks@startrek.website
minus-squaresecret300@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoah the old catch 22 that is the right use of that term right?
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 month agoA requires B but B requires A so neither gets started. I think Catch 22 is A requires B but B nullifies A so A is guaranteed to not get started. but there’s no need to be that pedantic, casually speaking. people know what you mean when you say catch 22. we could also just say it’s paradoxical.
ah the old catch 22
that is the right use of that term right?A requires B but B requires A so neither gets started.
I think Catch 22 is A requires B but B nullifies A so A is guaranteed to not get started.
but there’s no need to be that pedantic, casually speaking. people know what you mean when you say catch 22. we could also just say it’s paradoxical.