• kubok@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I recently hate-read Foucault’s Pendulum by Umberto Eco. I had started reading it twice and stopped after a few chapters. I am aware that the book is meant to be satire, but the point of satire is to be to the point instead of having to slog through 600+ pages of drivel.

  • Soapbox1858
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Catcher In The Rye

    What a miserable experience reading the whiney thoughts of that little shithead.

    Maybe it would have been more relatable if I read it at 15, but I read it at like 28 and it was insufferable.

    A close second is The Great Gatsby. I kept waiting for something interesting to happen and then just like that it was over.

  • InputZero@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Foundations by Isaac Asimov. It’s a great story but it’s a tough read. Way better as an audiobook.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      I like it but i noticed while reading it that Isaac Asimov has such an optimistic 1950s view, it can be challenging to keep reading with such limited conflict.

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Of books I’ve completed, Thomas Hardy’s The Mayor of Casterbridge. Read it at school, hated it (as well as Far from the Madding Crowd and Tess of the D’Urbervilles) - full of ridiculous coincidences. And also utterly miserable to boot.

    I started reading The Da Vinci Code, but gave up after the very first page.

  • Dagwood222
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I just noped out of a book called “Exquisite Corpse” by Poppy Z. Brite. It’s torture porn with necrophilia and sadism by the ton. It’s actually well written, but I just got sick of it.

  • funkforager@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Rich dad poor dad. Rich dad never existed. It’s all made up grift and, consequentially, people fall for it and make expensive life investment decisions after it.

    • Dagwood222
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I saw it as a play, and it was amazing. Never understood why English teachers have students read plays. The whole point of a play is to have it performed. It’s like trying to teach swimming in an empty pool.

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Harry Potter. I tried to read first book but couldn’t, the cringyness was high and the naming convention was straight up from 90’s bad fantasy book parody. It’s like one of the few books i not finished after i started, and i read a lot. And while the others are just forgettable experiences, HP is constantly in my face in media, reminding me of it.

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    the scarlet letter. I found it extremely unrelatable, and generally boring. I think The Crucible play by the same author arthur miller* conveys the same overarching principles about religious hypocrisy and herd mentality in a much more interesting way.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Possibly showing my ignorance here, but The Crucible is by Arthur Miller, and The Scarlet Letter is by Nathaniel Hawthorne - did either of them write a work with the other title as well? I can’t find anything to suggest they did, but I might be missing something.

    • beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’ve read it twice, and I agree. The plot amounts to spoiled, rich children take their ball and go home because they’re mad the poors won’t let them strip the world of resources for personal gain. The author makes it clear throughout the text that Dagny, Hank, and Galt are the heros for fucking off to larp as robber barons in the 1880’s.

      As a philosophic text objectivism is naive at best and a cynical justification for authoritarianism at its worst.

  • Alice@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    When I was a kid I absolutely loved The Chronicles of Narnia and I hated The Last Battle. I thought King Tirian was an unpleasant asshole and I thought killing the Pevensies sucked because they all go to Narnia Heaven forever while Susan has to bury them.

    It probably wasn’t a bad book but it felt like it ended my childhood.

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Charles Dickens wasn’t fun, back when we covered it in school