• dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I think it would be very hard to prosecute, because the Constitution gives direct protection to Members of Congress who are discussing matters at the Capitol in their official capacity, in the Speech and Debate clause. And since validating the Electoral College count is expressly spelled out in the Constitution as a thing Congress does, it will be hard to argue that the Speech and Debate Clause doesn’t apply.

    MTG passed out pictures of Hunter’s penis in Congress, after all, and is not likely to face any repercussions at all. (If she does, it will be because she tweeted it, too.,…)

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it all really depends on what you have evidence they said, saw and knew.

      Yeah, I agree it will be impossible to convict a congressional rep for voting against certification. BUT if you have evidence that person was attending meetings where a criminal conspiracy was taking place and especially if you have evidence they were directed to stall, and especially if they knew what was to happen after the vote failed… Then idk maybe they can be charged as part of a conspiracy. But just voting NO on it? I don’t think that’s criminal in and of itself.

      • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        Or took people on tours so they knew where to go when they broke into one of our biggest buildings of power and tried to murder at least our vice president.