Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agoDonald Trump Overtakes Kamala Harris in Seven-Point Swing Nationally: Pollwww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down193
arrow-up1-87arrow-down1external-linkDonald Trump Overtakes Kamala Harris in Seven-Point Swing Nationally: Pollwww.newsweek.comSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·1 day agoReddit bans everyone though, that’s not a good marker. ;) From a modding perspective, I look at it like this: “Would this link be allowed if it were anyone OTHER than Monk posting it?” Yes? It stays. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but it’s a valid link from a valid source.
minus-squarepooperNickellinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 day agoYeah, I don’t really understand the idea that a long history of a certain type of toxic behavior doesn’t count for anything. I think it should.
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 day agoI could be wrong, but I don’t think anyone’s complaining about the articles.
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agoOh, we get reports on the articles themselves ALL THE TIME.
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 day agoRight, but is the report about the link/article or the person submitting it? If it’s reported for anything under rules 3 or 4 I’d argue we all know damn well it’s not Newsweek that’s being reported.
minus-squareAmbiguousProps@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 day agoThe point is that the user themselves is toxic to have here, especially during an election season.
Reddit bans everyone though, that’s not a good marker. ;)
From a modding perspective, I look at it like this:
“Would this link be allowed if it were anyone OTHER than Monk posting it?”
Yes? It stays. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but it’s a valid link from a valid source.
Yeah, I don’t really understand the idea that a long history of a certain type of toxic behavior doesn’t count for anything. I think it should.
I could be wrong, but I don’t think anyone’s complaining about the articles.
Oh, we get reports on the articles themselves ALL THE TIME.
Right, but is the report about the link/article or the person submitting it? If it’s reported for anything under rules 3 or 4 I’d argue we all know damn well it’s not Newsweek that’s being reported.
The point is that the user themselves is toxic to have here, especially during an election season.