• JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Would you call the pyramids the most difficult engineering problems in human history? They had a whole lot worse tools. I wasn’t taking into account how much easier the tools make it, just the complexity of the challenge.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean. They were pretty challenging, I would expect.

      It’s just that Apollo dealt directly with rockets and boosters and so on.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s just that Apollo dealt directly with rockets and boosters and so on.

        What do you mean? Starship does too.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was about “Those are literally the engineers who worked on this, one of the most difficult engineering problems in human history, having nailed it on their first try.”

          And how the tools, materials, processes, and organizational structures to deal with those complexities do in fact make it easier than say the original Apollo missions.

          • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Easier for the individual people, but not an easier engineering challenge. 150T to LEO reusability is a harder problem statement 150T to LEO single use.