Why Does This Building by the Subway Need 193 Parking Spots? (Yes, Exactly 193.)
www.nytimes.com
New York and cities across the country reconsider decades-old parking rules.

In New York and elsewhere, the rules typically take the form of ratios [of parking spaces to retail and housing] that have been copied from one city to another, handed from one generation of engineers to the next without much study or skepticism.

  • dumples@midwest.socialEnglish
    7·
    1 day ago

    Removing parking minimums from new construction is a great method to slowly remove parking as a need to happen. This gives a great quick turn solution with a longer legs since only “needed” parking will be added as the surplus decreases.

    I do feel that reduce car use requires both removing of incentives to drive (like free unlimited parked as an assumption) as well as adding other transit options. I know personally that if I know parking is going to be bad I start considering all my options since driving is such a default option. We need it both ways. Especially since adding more transit options are not going to be built unless people use them. People will use them if they have to which brings pressure to make more and better options. This works best when the people who need to use them are affluent and powerful. We need both

    • Evotech@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      3 hours ago

      That’s what we’re gradually do over here in Norway, new apartment complexes does not even have 1 parking place per apartment, you have to buy one for about 40-60k usd if you want one

      There’s no requirements for guest parking either, which can be a pain. But basically everyone who wants to park needs to pay for it.

      They also removed free street parking. People are whining that it will kill the towns, because people can’t park in town for free, but not happened yet

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.netEnglish
      1·
      11 hours ago

      A good way can be to keep the same amount of mandated parking minimum but allows that up to x% (30%, 50%, 90% ?) of this parking can be replaced with secured bike parking (with precise specification on what is a secured bike parking, the same way as there is specifications for a car parking spot width, length …).

      This way this gives a choice, either the shop owner decide to ~save a fuckton of money on land and construction cost~ be environmentaly friendly and build bike parking instead of car parking spot, or he can still spend money on a huge parking lot if he is really against bike.

      ~ be sensitive to the environment and build bike parking