• Sundial
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “We are not in the business of censoring occasional addresses or dictating content to our guest speakers. That would be completely at odds with our values of freedom of expression,” a spokesperson said.

    This isn’t a censorship issue. Who on earth green-lit a speech regarding abortion and contraceptives for a graduating ceremony? In what world is that considered relevant? Especially in a multi-faith and diverse society like Australia.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Oh it’s relevant alright, he is just on the wrong side of both issues.
      I think the fact that so many left during the speech, demonstrates that it is is relevant, and most the people there don’t want conditions to get worse, just because some religious nut says so.

      • Sundial
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        In what way are these topics relevant to a graduation ceremony?

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          In the exact same way as talking about anything else that is highly relevant to the life of people starting out on a life of adulthood and responsibility and personal freedom.

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I think the topics are relevant to people leaving their very liberal, closed world of university and going out into a world that may not embrace them like they are used to. He very vocally reminded every woman and LGBTQ+ person in the audience that they are about to go into a world where assholes like him are going to be sitting next to them in the office trying to make their lives hell.