• Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They’ve attacked the fact she’s a childless woman plenty. Like if it mattered for her policies. I doubt they’ll straight up attack her for just being a woman much because they still want the conservative woman vote but they’ll sure as shit attack her for woman things.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Hey, that lady hasn’t had kids. I haven’t had kids, but that’s ok because I’m a man. Fuck that bitch, she doesn’t have kids, she can’t be an american. /s

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They’ve attacked her because she doesn’t have any biological children, not because she’s a woman. Although they may be related, the attacks were very specifically against her, not having any biological children.

        • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          8 hours ago

          They certainly make it as difficult as possible for game to adopt children.

          Stop trying to make this simple and black-and-white as they want you to think it is. They’re playing into their bullshit.

          • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            What?

            Nobody has ever called out a male politician for not having kids. Attacking her for not having kids is literally exclusively about gender.

            • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              34
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Nobody has ever called out a male politician for not having kids.

              You don’t know that. And if you’re claiming that’s a fact, then prove it.

              When you have to invent things just to make your point, you can’t have a very good point.

                  • 14th_cylon
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    no, they are saying you are an idiot. you not getting that is another proof.

                  • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    How do you go about proving a lack of evidence? If I claim that there are no bears living on the moon, and you demand proof, how can I possibly provide sufficient proof of a lack of bears?